[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#251715: marked as done (ITP: libswt3.0-gtk2 -- Fast and rich GUI toolkit for Java, gtk2 version)



Your message dated Tue, 17 Aug 2004 23:56:45 +0200
with message-id <20040817215645.GA5912@lucretia.debian.net>
and subject line cleanup
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 May 2004 12:50:31 +0000
>From jesper@zedlitz.de Sun May 30 05:50:31 2004
Return-path: <jesper@zedlitz.de>
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.186] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BUPln-0000Nb-00; Sun, 30 May 2004 05:50:31 -0700
Received: from [212.227.126.205] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de)
	by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
	id 1BUPll-0005Zg-00
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 30 May 2004 14:50:29 +0200
Received: from [80.134.162.113] (helo=server)
	by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
	id 1BUPll-0002Ie-00
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 30 May 2004 14:50:29 +0200
Received: by server (Postfix, from userid 1002)
	id 64E96A4FC7; Sun, 30 May 2004 14:50:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firefox (firefox.zedlitz.de [192.168.0.1])
	by server (Postfix) with SMTP id 17C0D8053
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 30 May 2004 14:49:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from jesper by firefox with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1BUPnZ-00085m-00; Sun, 30 May 2004 14:52:21 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: jesper@firefox.server
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: ITP: libswt3.0-gtk2 -- Fast and rich GUI toolkit for Java, gtk2 version
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.58
Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 14:52:21 +0200
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Message-Id: <E1BUPnZ-00085m-00@firefox>
Sender: <jesper@zedlitz.de>
X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:02c2ee567c670a62de7b5543fd79ee94
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
	NO_DNS_FOR_FROM,NO_REAL_NAME,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist


* Package name    : libswt3.0-gtk2
  Version         : 3.0
  Upstream Author : Eclipse Foundation
* URL             : http://www.eclipse.org/
* License         : Common Public License - v 1.0
  Description     : Fast and rich GUI toolkit for Java, gtk2 version

 SWT (Standard Widget Toolkit) provides functionality similar to Swing, but
 is much faster and open source. Mainly, it is used for the Eclipse platform.
 .
 This version of SWT is implemented using gtk2 libraries.
 .
 Currently the Milestone 9 (3.0 M9) is available for download, 
 but the 3.0 release should be ready in some days. 

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.21
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 251715-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Aug 2004 21:56:44 +0000
>From mechanix@lucretia.debian.net Tue Aug 17 14:56:44 2004
Return-path: <mechanix@lucretia.debian.net>
Received: from smtp1.xs4all.be [195.144.64.135] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BxBwi-0003kc-00; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 14:56:44 -0700
Received: from lucretia.hangar.be (195-144-080-143.dyn.adsl.xs4all.be [195.144.80.143])
	by smtp1.xs4all.be (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i7HLugYN031925;
	Tue, 17 Aug 2004 23:56:43 +0200
Received: by lucretia.hangar.be (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id F3C9E5B42; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 23:56:45 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 23:56:45 +0200
From: Filip Van Raemdonck <mechanix@debian.org>
To: 264153-done@bugs.debian.org, 249560-done@bugs.debian.org,
        264946-done@bugs.debian.org, 211429-done@bugs.debian.org,
        264068-done@bugs.debian.org, 85784-done@bugs.debian.org,
        265637-done@bugs.debian.org, 251715-done@bugs.debian.org,
        223067-done@bugs.debian.org, 243414-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: cleanup
Message-ID: <20040817215645.GA5912@lucretia.debian.net>
Mail-Followup-To: 264153-done@bugs.debian.org,
	249560-done@bugs.debian.org, 264946-done@bugs.debian.org,
	211429-done@bugs.debian.org, 264068-done@bugs.debian.org,
	85784-done@bugs.debian.org, 265637-done@bugs.debian.org,
	251715-done@bugs.debian.org, 223067-done@bugs.debian.org,
	243414-done@bugs.debian.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Marks-The-Spot: xxxxxxxxxx
X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1024D/8E950E00 CAC1 0932 B6B9 8768 40DB  C6AA 1239 F709 8E95 0E00
X-Machine-info: Linux lucretia 2.6.7-1-686 i686
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040803i
Delivered-To: 251715-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5

It seems that this package already exists in the archive.  If you have
uploaded the package yourself but forgotten to close this WNPP bug, please
read the instructions at http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp for handling
WNPP bugs properly.  You should close WNPP bugs in your initial upload
with a statement like "Initial upload. (Closes: #bugnumber)".  Thanks.
Of course, it might also be that someone else uploading this package,
in which case the statements above don't apply -- in any case, the package
seems to be in the archive now.


-- 
A. Top posters.
Q. What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?



Reply to: