[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#228534: marked as done (ITP: libxml-ruby -- Ruby interface to GNOME's libxml)



Your message dated Mon, 19 Jul 2004 16:00:08 -0400
with message-id <E1BmeIy-0005En-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#228534: fixed in libxml-ruby 0.3.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jan 2004 15:48:16 +0000
>From bortzmeyer@nic.fr Mon Jan 19 07:48:16 2004
Return-path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Received: from maya20.nic.fr [192.134.4.152] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AibdQ-0005Pb-00; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 07:48:16 -0800
Received: from vespucci.nic.fr (postfix@vespucci.nic.fr [192.134.4.68])
	by maya20.nic.fr (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id i0JFmEQW1546009;
	Mon, 19 Jan 2004 16:48:14 +0100 (CET)
Received: by vespucci.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 1055)
	id 98B31FB33; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 16:48:13 +0100 (CET)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: RFP: libxml-ruby -- Ruby interface to GNOME's libxml
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.20
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 16:48:13 +0100
Message-Id: <20040119154813.98B31FB33@vespucci.nic.fr>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2004-01-19
Severity: wishlist


* Package name    : libxml-ruby
  Version         : x.y.z
  Upstream Author : devel@rubynet.org
* URL             : http://www.rubynet.org/modules/xml/libxml/
* License         : Original BSD, apparently (see LICENSE)
  Description     : Ruby interface to GNOME's libxml

It implements XML parsing in C (the pure Ruby XML parser is awfully
slow) which would be quite welcome for packages like ZoneCheck.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux vespucci 2.4.24-1-686 #1 Tue Jan 6 21:29:44 EST 2004 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 228534-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jul 2004 20:10:49 +0000
>From dsilvers@newraff.debian.org Mon Jul 19 13:10:48 2004
Return-path: <dsilvers@newraff.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BmeTI-0004ha-00; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 13:10:48 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BmeIy-0005En-00; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 16:00:08 -0400
From: Andres Salomon <dilinger@voxel.net>
To: 228534-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#228534: fixed in libxml-ruby 0.3.4-1
Message-Id: <E1BmeIy-0005En-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <dsilvers@newraff.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 16:00:08 -0400
Delivered-To: 228534-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: libxml-ruby
Source-Version: 0.3.4-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libxml-ruby, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libxml-ruby1.8_0.3.4-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libx/libxml-ruby/libxml-ruby1.8_0.3.4-1_i386.deb
libxml-ruby_0.3.4-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libx/libxml-ruby/libxml-ruby_0.3.4-1.diff.gz
libxml-ruby_0.3.4-1.dsc
  to pool/main/libx/libxml-ruby/libxml-ruby_0.3.4-1.dsc
libxml-ruby_0.3.4.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/libx/libxml-ruby/libxml-ruby_0.3.4.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 228534@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Andres Salomon <dilinger@voxel.net> (supplier of updated libxml-ruby package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 22:12:41 -0400
Source: libxml-ruby
Binary: libxml-ruby1.8
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.3.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Andres Salomon <dilinger@voxel.net>
Changed-By: Andres Salomon <dilinger@voxel.net>
Description: 
 libxml-ruby1.8 - Ruby interface to libxml
Closes: 228534
Changes: 
 libxml-ruby (0.3.4-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial release (closes: #228534).
Files: 
 aecd5e8983567c629c7aa28776ab22f9 1337 admin optional libxml-ruby_0.3.4-1.dsc
 a4ad0ecc67a0234908e63d8362ed5498 33171 admin optional libxml-ruby_0.3.4.orig.tar.gz
 e6b03867c1fc8474aad8adc19118b27f 1833 admin optional libxml-ruby_0.3.4-1.diff.gz
 6aa4eb8e16504deb85a59b111d399da8 33850 admin optional libxml-ruby1.8_0.3.4-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: http://triplehelix.org/~joshk/pubkey_gpg.asc
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=AhmO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: