Hi everyone, Is there still a point to keeping the rdoc package around? It looks like it depends on Ruby 1.8, so it's equivalent to the rdoc1.8 package. If this is the case, I would suggest just removing rdoc and maybe renaming rdoc1.8 to rdoc. -- Joe Wreschnig <piman@debian.org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part