[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#239518: GPL vs. OSL



On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 10:20:55AM +0200, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
>AFAI can see elfutils is doubly licenced under GPL and/or OSL:
>
>* two COPYING files - one for GPL other for OSL
>* NEWS says:
>  "[...]
>   Version 0.91:
>   [...]
>   libelf: change to GPL from OSL1 for now."
>* elfutils.spec says:
>  "[...]
>   %changelog
>   * Wed Jan  7 2004 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> 0.91-2
>   - macroized spec file for GPL or OSL builds"
>
>Would you mind pointing me to some discussion of the problem, or
>telling me why you think that the current state of elfutils represents a
>problem?
>*t

Could someone shed some light on the license issues related to bug
#239518?

Anibal Monsalve Salazar
--
 .''`.  Debian GNU/Linux      | Building 28C
: :' :  Free Operating System | Monash University VIC 3800, Australia
`. `'   http://debian.org/    | http://www-personal.monash.edu/~anibal/
  `-                          |

Attachment: pgpxATB2Ud6dY.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: