[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#201406: marked as done (ITP: xmr -- A CLI-based search and retrieve frontend for XMMS)



Your message dated Sun, 28 Mar 2004 14:16:26 +0200
with message-id <200403281416.26025.tore@linpro.no>
and subject line No time
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jul 2003 12:07:53 +0000
>From tore@void.fud.no Tue Jul 15 07:07:50 2003
Return-path: <tore@void.fud.no>
Received: from s34.ifi.uio.no (void.fud.no) [129.240.72.34] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 19cOb0-000795-00; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 07:07:50 -0500
Received: from tore by void.fud.no with local (Exim 4.20)
	id 19cOaz-0005Uy-V3; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 14:07:50 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
From: Tore Anderson <tore@linpro.no>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: ITP: xmr -- A CLI-based search and retrieve frontend for XMMS
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.19
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 14:07:49 +0200
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Message-Id: <E19cOaz-0005Uy-V3@void.fud.no>
Sender: Tore Anderson <tore@void.fud.no>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=4.0
	tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,X_DEBBUGS_CC
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-15
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : xmr
  Version         : 0.4.5
  Upstream Author : Audun Hove
* URL             : http://audun.lnix.net/
* License         : GNU GPL
  Description     : search and retrieve frontend for XMMS

  xmr is a tiny, yet featureful utility which will index your music
 collection, allowing you to search through it using extended POSIX
 regular expressions, and use the results to manipulate XMMS's playlist.
 Selecting random songs or albums instead of searching is also
 supported.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux void 2.5.75 #1 Sat Jul 12 00:53:31 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=no_NO.ISO-8859-1


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 201406-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Mar 2004 12:16:42 +0000
>From tore@linpro.no Sun Mar 28 04:16:42 2004
Return-path: <tore@linpro.no>
Received: from head.linpro.no [80.232.36.1] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1B7ZDW-0006za-00; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 04:16:42 -0800
Received: from pride.fud.no ([213.145.167.26])
	by head.linpro.no with asmtp (Exim 4.14 #1 (Debian))
	id 1B7ZDT-0006yZ-16
	for <201406-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 14:16:39 +0200
From: Tore Anderson <tore@linpro.no>
Organization: Linpro AS
To: 201406-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: No time
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 14:16:26 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200403281416.26025.tore@linpro.no>
X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----)
X-Scanner: exiscan for exim4 (http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/) *1B7ZDT-0006yZ-16*BYsnD3U0bNg*
Delivered-To: 201406-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 


  I'll never get around to uploading this.

-- 
Tore Anderson



Reply to: