On Tue, 2004-03-23 at 20:26, Tom wrote: > On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 10:11:52AM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: > > Surely it's a too generic name nevertheless? > > Yeah, but I can't think of a better name, short of sticking my initials > on the end, which is what I did at sourceforge (although the "pim" > project is old and never released files.) > > I can't think of a pragmatic approach. My current inclination is to > name the package "pim-tb" and still have the binary just be called > "pim", and it could conflict with any future package with also provides > /usr/bin/pim. > > Alternately, I could name the binary "/usr/bin/pim_tb", or just try to > come up with completely different unique name. > > What's the most pragmatic thing to do? TUPIM - Tom's Unique PIM It doesn't turn up on freshmeat or sourceforge, although it also appears to be a town in Brazil. =-) Cheers, Pasc -- Pascal Hakim Do Not Bend
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part