Bug#238892: about libglade2 adoption
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I was planning on adopting libglade2 in cooperation with the Debian
GNOME Team, and uploading 2.3.6 to experimental with them, but you beat
me to the bugmail. Are you a DD? I am not, but was going to be sponsored
by the GNOME Team guys... if you want to maintain this that is fine with
me. Sebastian Bacher has asked me to maintain glade-2 and I figured I'd
take libglade2 along with it...
I have already checked in a debian/ dir for libglade2 2.3.6 into the
pkg-gnome subversion repository and have converted it to use cdbs; I
have not yet done the same for 2.0.1 in unstable although I have checked
the current 2.0.1 debian/ dir into our svn repository as well.
(http://svn.debian.org/viewcvs/pkg-gnome/ ; 2.0.1 is under
desktop/branches/2.4/ and 2.3.6 is under desktop/trunk/)
Also, Gustavo Noronha Silva has uploaded libglade2 2.0.1-7 just a few
minutes ago which contains a small fix in the Suggests: (it just had
'glade' and needed to be 'glade-2 | glade-gnome2') and he also changed
the maintainer to me, by my request.
I apologize for not mailing this in sooner.. I was too occupied with
learning cdbs and svn yesterday and forgot about hunting this bug down.
Please let me know what you think; I am most concerned with keeping you
from doing duplicate work. I believe the changes to build system for
2.3.6 could easily be used for 2.0.1 as well.
James Curbo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFAXhnYxMpqVQpLJj8RAlIrAJ0YIZsFhwzUGAq106PpWoYa3+w+4ACfffgj
0SQzhnp9Ov29CooSdryIP6E=
=2M0I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: