Bug#238411: ITP: JBoss -- J2EE based application server
Em Qui, 2004-03-18 às 15:58, Philipp Hug escreveu:
> sounds good. one thing to think about is support for multiple configuration:
very important...
> there are many options to solve this problem:
> 1. Just one configuration is used e.g. jboss-3.2.3/server/debian/.. all jboss
> sub-packages like database, web-console... go in here
well, this actually doesn't solve the problem, just bypass it...
> 2. Same as 1. but create a management tool to create custom configurations (with
> their corresponding directories) and let the user choose what to use (--> lots
> of work)
Something like the init levels? and the update-j2ee-appserver-rc.d
selecting in which configuration to create the links to the deploy
dir... it would be nice...
> 3. Same as 2, but let the user do the copying manually. just provide a debconf
> interface to choose the configuration he wants to use
Same as 1... doesn't solve the problem, just bypass (I know bypassing is
the easiest way of dealing with a problem:)
> 4. allow multiple configurations to run at the same time (--> difficult, because
> jboss listens on lots of ports, and I'm not sure if we can get rid of all of
> them)
I don't know if this is necessary, and I don't have a clue of how to do
it... :)
> J2EE-Idea
> This sounds good, although there aren't many opensource j2ee app servers yet and
> j2ee apps are not as comptible as they should ;-)
> But with jboss it's easy to implement this: just add another deployer directory.
exactly...
> Some other things, that are on my wishlist:
> 1. apache.conf that includes something like "ProxyPass /jboss
> http://localhost:8080/" (maybe use a different port by default, because this
> could cause problems with tomcat)
how to deal with tomcat is a good question, I use tomcat embedded in
jboss, which simpliflies a lot... do we need to ask to split tomcat into
tomcat-standalone and tomcat-embedded?
> 2. debconf to change the jboss.xml file (enable/disable features,...)
very important, since it's a pain to edit that file...
daniel
Reply to: