On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 09:31:23AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: > Just so people don't think this is being completely neglected... > > I've built a preliminary package, and then discovered that it can't cope > with devfs. Super. > I've sent a number of emails to upstream, ranging from "Hi, I'm going to > package up your software for Debian" to "Hey, this thing doesn't work with > devfs, I'll write a patch", without hearing a peep back. > I'm planning on writing a patch to allow it to work with devfs, but in the > meantime I'll probably enhance the current package to detect the presence of > devfs and do something intelligent (like fail elegantly), and then upload > it as is. Devfs being deprecated in linux 2.6, IMHO writing a patch is a waste of effort. Regards . Siggy
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature