Bug#188946: Debian GNU/Linux official package - #188946
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I just switched from AFBackup (which was _WAY_ to slow) to Bacula
(which is _WAY_ faster :) on two hosts (first a client of mine,
and when that worked so fine, I switched myself :).
Being a Debian GNU/Linux developer, I always try to use a .deb
package... There was an ITP (#188946), but that was old. Talking
to Patrick Cole, I discovered that 'someone else' (the upstream
author?) have been applying for DD status to upload Bacula...
I have already prepared some Debian GNU/Linux packages which conforms
to the Debian GNU/Linux packaging standards (which the upstream - i.e.
yours - does not).
These packages are built for 'sid' (unstable), so be carefull about
installing them on woody (current stable) or sarge (testing)...
ftp://ftp.bayour.com/pub/debian/dists/local/binary-all/Bacula/bacula-doc_1.32f.4-1_all.deb
ftp://ftp.bayour.com/pub/debian/dists/local/binary-i386/Bacula/*.deb
ftp://ftp.bayour.com/pub/debian/dists/local/source/Bacula/*
These packages have not been split like the upstream .deb's.
I was intending to hi-jack the ITP if that's ok (it seemed to be
ok for Patrick). Any objections from this list?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.6 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQFAQFmnmlWzPKccHgARAirSAJ4wAAoLwQ4CkC6+fI/vz9xxcmxAnQCfb2rd
yIJ6rFas6ZvD5ifikHobgLo=
=eOa6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: