[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#215522: marked as done (ITP: aspell-pt-br -- The Brazilian Portuguese dictionary for GNU Aspell)



Your message dated Mon, 03 Nov 2003 14:32:35 -0500
with message-id <E1AGkRH-0003OJ-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#215522: fixed in br.ispell 2.4.really.3.0.beta4-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Oct 2003 08:38:06 +0000
>From rafael@mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de Mon Oct 13 03:38:03 2003
Return-path: <rafael@mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de>
Received: from kom.psy.mpg.de (kom.mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de) [192.129.1.23] 
	by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1A8yDI-0003sf-00; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 03:38:00 -0500
Received: from 10.1.1.2 by kom.mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Mon, 13 Oct 2003 10:40:33 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time)
Received: from [10.80.1.239] (helo=laboiss0)
	by amalie.intra.mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
	id 1A8yD4-0003FD-00; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 10:37:46 +0200
Received: from rafael by laboiss0 with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1A8yDG-0000DV-00; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 10:37:58 +0200
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 10:37:58 +0200
From: Rafael Laboissiere <rafael@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Cc: Carlos Laviola <claviola@ax.net.br>, Brian Nelson <pyro@debian.org>
Subject: ITP: aspell-pt-br -- The Brazilian Portuguese dictionary for GNU Aspell
Message-ID: <20031013083758.GF2799@laboiss0>
Reply-To: Rafael Laboissiere <rafael@debian.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.29
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Organization: Debian GNU/Linux
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Rafael Laboissiere <rafael@mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
	tests=HAS_PACKAGE
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_09
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_09 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-10-13
Severity: wishlist


* Package name    : aspell-pt-br
  Version         : 
  Upstream Author : 
* URL             : http://people.debian.org/~rafael/br.ispell
* License         : GPL
  Description     : The Brazilian Portuguese dictionary for GNU Aspell

Actually, aspell-pt-br does not represent a new source package, but rather
the result of the reorganization of two other packages: aspell-pt and
br.ispell.  I thought, though, that it would be better to have this
reorganization registered somewhere in the Debian BTS, hence this "ITP"
announcement.

Here is the tale: I was once the maintainer of the ibrazilian package, which
is now maintained by Carlos Laviola.  I decided to re-adopt it and when I
compiled the last (beta) version of the br.ispell source package, I noticed
that an aspell word list was generated, which is better than that shipped
with the aspell-pt package.

In order to have the word list in br.ispell superseding the one in
aspell-pt, the development of these two source packages must be coordinated.
I approached Brian Nelson (the maintainer of aspell-pt) and he offered the
package to me.

I prepared an apt-getable repository for the new packages at:

    http://people.debian.org/~rafael/br.ispell

The name of the package was chosen following the language code pt_BR. The
name aspell-br would be not appropriate, since br is the code for the Breton
language (spoken in Britany, France).

If there are no objections, I will soon upload the packages to unstable.  

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux laboiss0 2.4.19-686 #1 Mon Nov 18 23:59:03 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US



---------------------------------------
Received: (at 215522-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Nov 2003 19:38:32 +0000
>From troup@auric.debian.org Mon Nov 03 13:38:21 2003
Return-path: <troup@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AGkWm-00061q-00; Mon, 03 Nov 2003 13:38:16 -0600
Received: from troup by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AGkRH-0003OJ-00; Mon, 03 Nov 2003 14:32:35 -0500
From: Rafael Laboissiere <rafael@debian.org>
To: 215522-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.25 $
Subject: Bug#215522: fixed in br.ispell 2.4.really.3.0.beta4-3
Message-Id: <E1AGkRH-0003OJ-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: James Troup <troup@auric.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 14:32:35 -0500
Delivered-To: 215522-close@bugs.debian.org

Source: br.ispell
Source-Version: 2.4.really.3.0.beta4-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
br.ispell, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

aspell-pt-br_2.4.really.3.0.beta4-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/b/br.ispell/aspell-pt-br_2.4.really.3.0.beta4-3_i386.deb
br.ispell_2.4.really.3.0.beta4-3.dsc
  to pool/main/b/br.ispell/br.ispell_2.4.really.3.0.beta4-3.dsc
br.ispell_2.4.really.3.0.beta4-3.tar.gz
  to pool/main/b/br.ispell/br.ispell_2.4.really.3.0.beta4-3.tar.gz
brazilian-conjugate_2.4.really.3.0.beta4-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/b/br.ispell/brazilian-conjugate_2.4.really.3.0.beta4-3_all.deb
ibrazilian_2.4.really.3.0.beta4-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/b/br.ispell/ibrazilian_2.4.really.3.0.beta4-3_i386.deb
myspell-pt-br_2.4.really.3.0.beta4-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/b/br.ispell/myspell-pt-br_2.4.really.3.0.beta4-3_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 215522@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Rafael Laboissiere <rafael@debian.org> (supplier of updated br.ispell package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 23:11:02 +0200
Source: br.ispell
Binary: ibrazilian myspell-pt-br brazilian-conjugate aspell-pt-br
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 2.4.really.3.0.beta4-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Rafael Laboissiere <rafael@debian.org>
Changed-By: Rafael Laboissiere <rafael@debian.org>
Description: 
 aspell-pt-br - The Brazilian Portuguese dictionary for GNU Aspell
 brazilian-conjugate - Brazilian Portuguese verb conjugator
 ibrazilian - The Brazilian Portuguese dictionary for ispell
 myspell-pt-br - The Brazilian Portuguese dictionary for myspell
Closes: 215522
Changes: 
 br.ispell (2.4.really.3.0.beta4-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * First upload to Debia unstable (closes: #215522).
Files: 
 356230afd71e631ac006e008ff3f4ecf 640 text optional br.ispell_2.4.really.3.0.beta4-3.dsc
 4f34d5da522bc4170d9fa3a00d7119f2 246940 text optional br.ispell_2.4.really.3.0.beta4-3.tar.gz
 d502fa6ac42636c99f2b20ba5cf133aa 63348 text extra brazilian-conjugate_2.4.really.3.0.beta4-3_all.deb
 65afede2d53320ea65cafb8a812adc9d 161424 text optional myspell-pt-br_2.4.really.3.0.beta4-3_all.deb
 15a4f5d595a324873827a050f0ee9964 361194 text optional ibrazilian_2.4.really.3.0.beta4-3_i386.deb
 ef159e5b1c78c89bd2a428ba3c552175 3215896 text optional aspell-pt-br_2.4.really.3.0.beta4-3_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/lvU+k3oga0pdcv4RAo/5AJ9cAwuMeqRkccigpnLo9uTwkruCLwCeLAU2
2nDp2ZyJt5MxLDOfXFHmwj4=
=9XEH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: