Bug#215552: marked as done (O: xpp -- X Printing Panel)
Your message dated Mon, 13 Oct 2003 09:53:12 -0400
with message-id <003b01c39191$57d024d0$0300a8c0@EllisNotebook>
and subject line I have not abandoned my packages
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Oct 2003 11:26:29 +0000
>From tbm@cyrius.com Mon Oct 13 06:26:04 2003
Return-path: <tbm@cyrius.com>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A90pw-0006kq-00; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 06:26:04 -0500
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 2177926B95; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 13:26:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id B397AFE99; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 21:25:42 +1000 (EST)
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 21:25:42 +1000
From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Cc: "Scott K. Ellis" <scott@debian.org>
Subject: O: xpp -- X Printing Panel
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20031013112542.GA12622@deprecation.cyrius.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-MIA-Summary: Orphaning: xpp
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_09 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The current maintainer of xpp, Scott K. Ellis <scott@debian.org>, is
apparently not active anymore. Therefore, I orphan this package now.
If you want to be the new maintainer, please take it -- see
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/index.html#howto-o for detailed
instructions how to adopt a package properly.
Some information about this package:
Package: xpp
Binary: xpp
Version: 1.1-0.2
Priority: optional
Section: x11
Maintainer: Scott K. Ellis <scott@debian.org>
Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0), xlibs, libfltk1.1-dev, fluid, libcupsys2-dev, cupsys
Architecture: any
Standards-Version: 3.6.0
Format: 1.0
Directory: pool/main/x/xpp
Files: b17ea883514db45ce6cf826c616bfbf9 594 xpp_1.1-0.2.dsc
abf4634edf3ff15c6f4db436d68fa835 72611 xpp_1.1.orig.tar.gz
6c909297f3ad7dafa8c16b2b3ad113fc 8791 xpp_1.1-0.2.diff.gz
Package: xpp
Priority: optional
Section: x11
Installed-Size: 172
Maintainer: Scott K. Ellis <scott@debian.org>
Architecture: i386
Version: 1.1-0.2
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.2-1), libcupsys2 (>= 1.1.19final-1), libfltk1.1c102 (>= 1.1.3+1.1.4rc2), libgcc1 (>= 1:3.3.1-1), libstdc++5 (>= 1:3.3.1-1), xlibs (>> 4.1.0)
Filename: pool/main/x/xpp/xpp_1.1-0.2_i386.deb
Size: 47840
MD5sum: 7825d08dd3b917490fc3c62e4a7b3876
Description: X Printing Panel
Graphical substitute for the lp/lpr command. With xpp, you can control
every printing option known to the CUPS print system (the cupsys package).
Best results are available with usage of the appropriate PPD file for your
printer. Each user can save their own customized printing preferences.
.
Home Page: http://cups.sourceforge.net/xpp/
Justification: All packages were NMUed several times, last MU in November
2001, was mailed several times.
--
Martin Michlmayr
tbm@cyrius.com
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 215552-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Oct 2003 13:53:47 +0000
>From storm@stormcrow.org Mon Oct 13 08:53:42 2003
Return-path: <storm@stormcrow.org>
Received: from ms-smtp-03.southeast.rr.com [24.93.67.84]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A938M-0007X2-00; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 08:53:14 -0500
Received: from radagast (clt74-83-125.carolina.rr.com [24.74.83.125])
by ms-smtp-03.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.2) with ESMTP id h9DDoqVx007361;
Mon, 13 Oct 2003 09:50:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from EllisNotebook (unknown [192.168.0.3])
by radagast (Postfix) with SMTP
id 944618071; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 09:53:12 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <003b01c39191$57d024d0$0300a8c0@EllisNotebook>
From: "Scott K. Ellis" <storm@stormcrow.org>
To: <215550-done@bugs.debian.org>, <215551-done@bugs.debian.org>,
<215552-done@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: I have not abandoned my packages
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 09:53:12 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Delivered-To: 215552-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0
tests=none
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_13
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_13 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Contrary to Martin's mistaken belief, I have not orphaned these packages. I
have had time problems and problems with my PGP key that have limited my
ability to upload new packages. If someone who has more time and interest
wants to NMU or adopt them, I'm fine with that. But I haven't abandoned
them and will work through getting them updated eventually (sooner rather
than later I hope).
Reply to: