Bug#128456: marked as done (ITP: porz -- Client for the libsnsp)
Your message dated 11 May 2003 14:37:53 +0200
with message-id <1052656672.1495.93.camel@p4.domain.lan>
and subject line porz client
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2002 17:52:58 +0000
>From noel@hostsharing.net Wed Jan 09 11:52:58 2002
Return-path: <noel@hostsharing.net>
Received: from hopi.hostsharing.net [66.70.34.150]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16OMuI-0004as-00; Wed, 09 Jan 2002 11:52:58 -0600
Received: by hopi.hostsharing.net (Postfix, from userid 542)
id E214298131; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 18:52:32 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 18:52:32 +0100
From: Noel Koethe <noel@koethe.net>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: ITP: porz - client for the libsnsp
Message-ID: <20020109175232.GA22452@hopi.hostsharing.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
package: wnpp
URL: http://porz.org/
licence: GPL
The Simple Network Scanning Protocol is a simple and extensible protocol for provided and distributed portscanning. It is a human readable protocol (compares with SmTP in style).
If you are getting curious, you can just have a look at the InternetDraft. This draft is currently in development:
http://porz.org/files/draft-snsp.txt
(from http://porz.org/wikidx.cgi?SnSP)
anounced on http://www.heise.de/newsticker/data/wst-28.12.01-000/
(german, sorry no english version available)
--
Noèl Köthe
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 128456-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2003 13:09:16 +0000
>From noel@debian.org Sun May 11 08:09:04 2003
Return-path: <noel@debian.org>
Received: from www.hostsharing.net (pima.hostsharing.net) [212.42.230.151]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 19EqZZ-0001PI-00; Sun, 11 May 2003 08:09:01 -0500
Received: from p4.domain.lan (p508E97E8.dip.t-dialin.net [80.142.151.232])
(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pima.hostsharing.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B5D2CE989
for <128456-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 11 May 2003 15:09:01 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: porz client
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?No=E8l_K=F6the?= <noel@debian.org>
To: 128456-done@bugs.debian.org
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-CKCahrUd/zh5FhxqON1j"
Organization: Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org
Message-Id: <1052656672.1495.93.camel@p4.domain.lan>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4
Date: 11 May 2003 14:37:53 +0200
Delivered-To: 128456-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-13.6 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,USER_AGENT_XIMIAN
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
--=-CKCahrUd/zh5FhxqON1j
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello,
upstream seems to be dead and I don't want to add it into Debian
anymore.
--=20
No=C3=A8l K=C3=B6the <noel debian.org>
Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org
--=-CKCahrUd/zh5FhxqON1j
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQA+vkQg9/DnDzB9Vu0RAs2nAJ9st+BWAErMlkIP/uLnryYyCuVVPQCeIXDy
4mh2KLh4UafqC4SrK5aFwL8=
=cgld
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-CKCahrUd/zh5FhxqON1j--
Reply to: