[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#217098: marked as done (ITA: hdparm)



Your message dated Thu, 23 Oct 2003 16:20:15 -0400
with message-id <E1AClwN-0000nn-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#217098: fixed in hdparm 5.4-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Oct 2003 17:46:44 +0000
>From ccheney@conr-adsl-cheney.txucom.net Wed Oct 22 12:46:43 2003
Return-path: <ccheney@conr-adsl-cheney.txucom.net>
Received: from (pico.surpasshosting.com) [64.5.56.18] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1ACN4F-0008IE-00; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 12:46:43 -0500
Received: from conr-adsl-cheney.txucom.net ([207.70.165.48] helo=calc)
	by pico.surpasshosting.com with esmtp (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.24)
	id 1ACN49-0007Gs-UF; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 12:46:38 -0500
Received: from ccheney by calc with local (Exim 4.24)
	id 1ACN4C-0006CX-QW; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 12:46:40 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Chris Cheney <ccheney@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: O: hdparm -- Tune hard disk parameters for high performance
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.34
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 12:46:40 -0500
Message-Id: <[🔎] E1ACN4C-0006CX-QW@calc>
Sender: "Christopher L. Cheney" <ccheney@conr-adsl-cheney.txucom.net>
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - pico.surpasshosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - bugs.debian.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - conr-adsl-cheney.txucom.net
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.5 required=4.0
	tests=BAYES_90,HAS_PACKAGE
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_21
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_21 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

I intend to orphan the hdparm package.
The package description is:
 get/set hard disk parameters for Linux IDE drives.
 Primary use is for enabling irq-unmasking and IDE multiplemode.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux calc 2.6.0-test7-bk1 #1 SMP Thu Oct 9 21:53:14 CDT 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 217098-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2003 20:24:04 +0000
>From katie@auric.debian.org Thu Oct 23 15:24:04 2003
Return-path: <katie@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1ACm03-0000jT-00; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 15:24:03 -0500
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AClwN-0000nn-00; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 16:20:15 -0400
From: Stephen Gran <sgran@debian.org>
To: 217098-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.42 $
Subject: Bug#217098: fixed in hdparm 5.4-3
Message-Id: <E1AClwN-0000nn-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@auric.debian.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 16:20:15 -0400
Delivered-To: 217098-close@bugs.debian.org

Source: hdparm
Source-Version: 5.4-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
hdparm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

hdparm_5.4-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/h/hdparm/hdparm_5.4-3.diff.gz
hdparm_5.4-3.dsc
  to pool/main/h/hdparm/hdparm_5.4-3.dsc
hdparm_5.4-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/h/hdparm/hdparm_5.4-3_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 217098@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Stephen Gran <sgran@debian.org> (supplier of updated hdparm package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 14:00:37 -0400
Source: hdparm
Binary: hdparm
Architecture: source i386
Version: 5.4-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stephen Gran <sgran@debian.org>
Changed-By: Stephen Gran <sgran@debian.org>
Description: 
 hdparm     - Tune hard disk parameters for high performance
Closes: 87451 149558 157919 169406 175506 190867 198516 212257 217098
Changes: 
 hdparm (5.4-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New maintainer (closes: #217098)
   * Fix description of -A in manpage (closes: #212257)
   * Build uses cdbs now, which supports building unstripped (closes: #190867)
   * Change reference to boot time script to reflect actual file
      (closes: #157919)
   * /etc/apm/20hdparm now handles multiple drives (closes: #149558)
   * /etc/init.d/hdparm and /etc/default/hdparm now included.
     Many thanks to Shaul Karl <shaul@rakefet> and Joerg Sommer
     <joerg@alea.gnuu.de> for suggestions and samples.
     (closes: #87451, #169406, #175506, #198516)
Files: 
 c69f7d8ab9fea644642b9304b47d4161 566 admin optional hdparm_5.4-3.dsc
 2823506f49e572453be9fe1ff9ef1fb6 5518 admin optional hdparm_5.4-3.diff.gz
 892a5909c81fc9aa50ae535a9b10ce55 41384 admin optional hdparm_5.4-3_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/mBhMSYIMHOpZA44RAi3iAKDCh9cdl/Tx7KfzCo66uw9RyjwVUQCgtLJe
Bw6a4gLIdNAmV/wSZwzgb70=
=biWb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: