[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#131125: marked as done (RFP: cleanup-woody -- remove packages that were in potato but that are not in woody)



Your message dated Sun, 31 Aug 2003 21:39:34 +0200
with message-id <20030831193934.GX7038@fs.tum.de>
and subject line That's not really needed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jan 2002 13:32:04 +0000
>From bunk@fs.tum.de Sun Jan 27 07:32:04 2002
Return-path: <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de (mailhub.stusta.mhn.de) [141.84.69.5] 
	by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 16UpPf-00016q-00; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 07:32:03 -0600
Received: (qmail 8979 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2002 13:32:02 -0000
Received: from r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (10.150.63.144)
  by mailhub.stusta.mhn.de with SMTP; 27 Jan 2002 13:32:02 -0000
Received: from bunk by r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 16UpOp-0002nI-00; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 14:31:11 +0100
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: RFP: cleanup-woody -- remove packages that were in potato but that are not in woody
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.41.14213
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.41.14213
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 14:31:10 +0100
Message-Id: <E16UpOp-0002nI-00@r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-01-27
Severity: wishlist


I had the idea someone could perhaps provide a package that consists
of nothing else than a "Conflicts:" line and that conflicts with every
package that was in potato but is not in woody. This would be an easy
way for a system administrator to get rid of obsolete packages like e.g.
gzilla and emacs19 by doing a simple "apt-get install cleanup-woody".

Notes:
- there might be better names for the package than "cleanup-woody"
- the creation of this package only makes sense at some time near the
  end of a freeze and it might need a special exception to enter the
  frozen distribution (in practice this shouldn't be a big problem because
  this package can't cause non-obvious breakages)



---------------------------------------
Received: (at 131125-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Aug 2003 19:39:48 +0000
>From bunk@fs.tum.de Sun Aug 31 14:39:46 2003
Return-path: <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Received: from hermes.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de [129.187.202.12] 
	by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 19tY38-00014x-00; Sun, 31 Aug 2003 14:39:46 -0500
Received: (qmail 7397 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2003 19:39:39 -0000
Received: from mimas.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de (129.187.202.58)
  by hermes.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de with QMQP; 31 Aug 2003 19:39:39 -0000
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 21:39:34 +0200
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
To: 131125-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: That's not really needed
Message-ID: <20030831193934.GX7038@fs.tum.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Delivered-To: 131125-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0
	tests=BAYES_01,USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

aptitude has enough functionality for this purpose.

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed



Reply to: