On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 19:20, Dave Rolsky wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Jay Bonci wrote: > > > I'm currently working on getting alzabo into the Debian GNU/Linux > > distribution. It depends on Class::Factory::Util, as you know, which > > will end up as it's own package. > > Cool, this means I won't have to figure out how to do it! Yeah, it's going to be a little tricky. I just got Module::Build in the archive, so it shouldn't be too bad. I'm looking into a patch for Build.PL and/or Alzabo::Build that would allow the specification of paths and question answers either in %ENV vars, or preferably on the command line. I'll pass along a patch when I have one ready. > > I would assume that all of your perl modules are licensed "same as > > perl" (most are listed as such on your CPAN page), but I just want to > > clarify that with you for Class::Factory::Util before we go distributing > > your module. > > Yep, all my modules are same as Perl itself. Great, thanks for clarifying. > > Also, in the manpage, should it say " use CLass::Factory::Util" instead > > of "use Class::Util". Is that intentional, or from an older version of > > the module? > > Sounds like a bug. > > I'll release a new version that includes a LICENSE file and fixes the > docs. Okay, I'll wait for your changed upstream, and get that one packaged up. --jay cc'ed the alzabo ITP
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part