Bug#202252: marked as done (ITP: acheck -- Check common localisation mistakes)
Your message dated Tue, 29 Jul 2003 00:03:58 -0400
with message-id <E19hLiQ-0001aA-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#202252: fixed in acheck 0.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jul 2003 09:18:07 +0000
>From nico.bertol@free.fr Mon Jul 21 04:10:25 2003
Return-path: <nico.bertol@free.fr>
Received: from postfix3-2.free.fr [213.228.0.169]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19eWgb-0000ay-00; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 04:10:25 -0500
Received: from bertol (lns-th2-10-82-64-158-236.adsl.proxad.net [82.64.158.236])
by postfix3-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44728C178
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 11:10:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from nico by bertol with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 19eWgR-00013U-00; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 11:10:15 +0200
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 11:10:15 +0200
From: Nicolas Bertolissio <nico.bertol@free.fr>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: ITP: acheck -- Check common localisation mistakes
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20030721091015.GA3803@free.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.18
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT,X_DEBBUGS_CC
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-21
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : acheck
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Nicolas Bertolissio <nico.bertol@free.fr>
* URL : http://nico.bertol.free.fr/acheck/acheck.1.html
* License : GPL
Description : Check common localisation mistakes
acheck, any text file checker, is a Perl script to help both translators and
reviewers checking and fixing common localisation mistakes according to file
type and rules.
.
aspell can be used to check word spelling.
This is already packaged at the above URL.
I am waiting for DAM approval with another package (ddtc), and I have
already found a sponsor for this one.
Other ITP acheck-rules and acheck-rules-fr are related to this one of
course.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux bertol 2.4.20 #3 SMP sam fév 15 16:58:20 CET 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=fr_FR@euro, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR@euro
--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 202252-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jul 2003 04:08:24 +0000
>From rdonald@auric.debian.org Mon Jul 28 23:08:24 2003
Return-path: <rdonald@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19hLmi-0001sl-00; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 23:08:24 -0500
Received: from rdonald by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19hLiQ-0001aA-00; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 00:03:58 -0400
From: Nicolas Bertolissio <nico.bertol@free.fr>
To: 202252-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.23 $
Subject: Bug#202252: fixed in acheck 0.2
Message-Id: <E19hLiQ-0001aA-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: Randall Donald <rdonald@auric.debian.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 00:03:58 -0400
Delivered-To: 202252-close@bugs.debian.org
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
acheck, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
acheck_0.2.dsc
to pool/main/a/acheck/acheck_0.2.dsc
acheck_0.2.tar.gz
to pool/main/a/acheck/acheck_0.2.tar.gz
acheck_0.2_all.deb
to pool/main/a/acheck/acheck_0.2_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 202252@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Nicolas Bertolissio <nico.bertol@free.fr> (supplier of updated acheck package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 01:57:36 +0200
Source: acheck
Binary: acheck
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Nicolas Bertolissio <nico.bertol@free.fr>
Changed-By: Nicolas Bertolissio <nico.bertol@free.fr>
Description:
acheck - Check common localisation mistakes
Closes: 202252
Changes:
acheck (0.2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* use `${perl:Depends}' to calculate perl dependency
* fix missing warning if aspell module missing
thanks to Denis Barbier for reporting this bug
* fix `--rules' option to rules settting
* add `--type' option for filetype setting
* entering Debian archive (closes: bug#202252)
* clean `debian/' directory
- remove empty `README.Debian'
- add `Build-Depends-Indep: perl
- improve description
- clean `rules'
- Recommends aspell perl module (instead of suggests)
thanks to Denis Barbier for all these
Files:
2d089708d2ffedb66f9e7f328847a3e1 503 text optional acheck_0.2.dsc
ce3532b94bb870efd22e7efd132298ab 20218 text optional acheck_0.2.tar.gz
beab6f12b9af6e07a2f52c809002056b 30542 text optional acheck_0.2_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/Higq8Ri1lR4WGvsRAt7SAJ4imepFinPUD7drbtbz+Yod/6qlFQCffdbC
QzTBPVSm8z8OsAiGADrZRIM=
=dAg1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: