On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 03:42:09PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > When you say "MIT", I presume you mean "MIT X11"? > > MIT has authored many licenses over the years, I feel sure. At least according to opensource.org, there is only "The MIT License": http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php This is the one to which I am referring. Could I somehow make this less ambiguous? I was initially surprised by the simplicity also, but it does seem to be consistent. Thanks, - Keegan
Attachment:
pgpCCDIqzaY_y.pgp
Description: PGP signature