[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#92248: marked as done (RFP: xemacs-packages -- Debian packaging of XEmacs packages)



Your message dated Sun, 20 Jul 2003 08:53:53 -0700
with message-id <87znj9i48e.fsf@user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com>
and subject line Stop packaging of xemacs-packages -- Debian packaging of XEmacs packages?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Mar 2001 01:10:59 +0000
>From daniel@adsl-63-193-247-253.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net Fri Mar 30 19:10:59 2001
Return-path: <daniel@adsl-63-193-247-253.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net>
Received: from murphy.debian.org [216.234.231.6] 
	by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 14j9us-0008AZ-00; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 19:10:58 -0600
Received: (qmail 24381 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2001 01:10:55 -0000
Received: from adsl-63-193-247-253.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (mail@63.193.247.253)
  by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2001 01:10:55 -0000
Received: from daniel by adsl-63-193-247-253.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
	id 14j9px-00088A-00; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 17:05:53 -0800
To: Debian GNU/Linux bug list <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Cc: James LewisMoss <dres@debian.org>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: ITP: xemacs-packages -- Debian packaging of XEmacs packages
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Daniel Schepler <schepler@math.berkeley.edu>
Date: 30 Mar 2001 17:05:53 -0800
Message-ID: <87d7aylpce.fsf@adsl-63-193-247-253.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net>
Lines: 17
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: Daniel Schepler <daniel@adsl-63-193-247-253.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

I'd be interested in working on a set of scripts to convert the XEmacs
packages into Debian packages.  I'm trying to decide whether to make
each one a separate source package, with an extra priority package
containing the scripts; or whether to put everything into one source
package.  Right now I'm leaning toward the first choice: then when one
of the packages is updated, only that package would have to be
upgraded by people using XEmacs.  But that has the slight disadvantage
of cluttering up the Sources file.

I'd be interested in any opinions you might have about this.
-- 
Daniel Schepler              "Please don't disillusion me.  I
schepler@math.berkeley.edu    haven't had breakfast yet."
                                 -- Orson Scott Card

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 92248-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jul 2003 15:54:05 +0000
>From daniel@frobnitz.ddts.net Sun Jul 20 10:54:02 2003
Return-path: <daniel@frobnitz.ddts.net>
Received: from barry.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.25] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 19eGVe-0006NX-00; Sun, 20 Jul 2003 10:54:02 -0500
Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3])
	by barry.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
	id 19eGVX-0001Bo-00; Sun, 20 Jul 2003 11:53:55 -0400
Received: from daniel by user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com with local (Exim 4.20)
	id 19eGVV-0001Pd-PG; Sun, 20 Jul 2003 08:53:53 -0700
To: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
Cc: 92248-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Stop packaging of xemacs-packages -- Debian packaging of XEmacs
 packages?
References: <20030720125425.GF11635@mails.so.argh.org>
From: Daniel Schepler <schepler@math.berkeley.edu>
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 08:53:53 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20030720125425.GF11635@mails.so.argh.org> (Andreas Barth's
 message of "Sun, 20 Jul 2003 14:54:25 +0200")
Message-ID: <87znj9i48e.fsf@user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Rational FORTRAN, linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: Daniel Schepler <daniel@frobnitz.ddts.net>
Delivered-To: 92248-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-15.5 required=4.0
	tests=BAYES_10,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
	      REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_GNUS_UA
	autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org> writes:

> tags 92248 +unreproducible
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> I think this report should be closed, because there is no source but
> the original reporter said he is "interested in working on a set of
> scripts". However, no code, no package.
>
> However, if you think different please say so and please retitle to
> ITP (and then work on it ;).
> If no-one stands up, I will close this RFP in one month.

Actually, I did produce split packages once.  But it turned out to be
way too many small packages for Anthony Towns' taste.
-- 
Daniel Schepler              "Please don't disillusion me.  I
schepler@math.berkeley.edu    haven't had breakfast yet."
                                 -- Orson Scott Card



Reply to: