[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#68144: marked as done (RFP: dexpire -- expire INN articles)



Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 19:38:25 +0200
with message-id <877k6fenvy.fsf@rover.gag.com>
and subject line never mind
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at quiet) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Aug 2000 00:12:57 +0000
>From mmagallo@master.debian.org Mon Jul 31 19:12:57 2000
Return-path: <mmagallo@master.debian.org>
Received: from mmagallo by master.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
	id 13JPg0-0000Nw-00; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 19:12:56 -0500
From: "Bdale Garbee" <bdale@gag.com>
To: quiet@bugs.debian.org
Cc: "Bdale Garbee" <bdale@gag.com>
Subject: ITP: dexpire -- expire INN articles
X-Mailer: feedbts -- Flames to mmagallo@debian.org
Message-Id: <E13JPg0-0000Nw-00@master.debian.org>
Sender: Marcelo Magallon <mmagallo@master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 19:12:56 -0500
Delivered-To: quiet@bugs.debian.org

Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Submitted: 19980706

The person listed as the submitter of this bug has stated his intention to
package dexpire -- expire INN articles.
If you are interested in this package, and the ITP was submited a long time
ago (3 months or so), the prospective maintainer can be reached via
nnnnn-submitter@bugs.debian.org.  If you contact him, please remember to be
polite, Debian maintainers are volunteers, and Read Life has the nasty habit
of getting in the way.  Once you upload the package and it's installed on the
archive, please remember to close this bug (or include a Closes: bug#nnnnn
statement on your changelog).

This report was automatically fed into the BTS database.  The original
submission date to the WNPP system was 19980706.

You are getting a copy of this mail because your emai address was
listed on the WNPP as the person who submited the original request to the
system.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 68144-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jul 2003 17:41:15 +0000
>From bdale@gag.com Fri Jul 18 12:41:12 2003
Return-path: <bdale@gag.com>
Received: from winfree.gag.com [192.133.104.8] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 19dZEG-00044l-00; Fri, 18 Jul 2003 12:41:12 -0500
Received: from spampd.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by winfree.gag.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C9B0C6AD
	for <68144-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 18 Jul 2003 11:41:08 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from rover.gag.com (s30.ifi.uio.no [129.240.72.30])
	by winfree.gag.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B00EC1C7
	for <68144-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 18 Jul 2003 11:38:27 -0600 (MDT)
Received: by rover.gag.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 01EDA43C81; Fri, 18 Jul 2003 19:38:25 +0200 (CEST)
To: 68144-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: never mind
From: Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 19:38:25 +0200
Message-ID: <877k6fenvy.fsf@rover.gag.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: 68144-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0
	tests=BAYES_01,USER_AGENT_GNUS_UA
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

I no longer have a direct need for something like dexpire, Md suggests that
there are good solutions for people with the class of problem dexpire
addresses in INN 2, and enough time has passed with nobody responding to this
RFP....  that I hereby close this RFP with no action taken.

Bdale



Reply to: