Bug#190410: marked as done (O: libapache-request-perl)
Your message dated Wed, 23 Apr 2003 22:37:11 -0700
with message-id <20030424053711.GB1163@hank>
and subject line O: libapache-request-perl
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Apr 2003 23:27:26 +0000
>From ivan@420.am Wed Apr 23 18:27:26 2003
Return-path: <ivan@420.am>
Received: from cleanwhisker.420.am [205.179.65.211] (qmailr)
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 198TeA-00015q-00; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 18:27:26 -0500
Received: (qmail 8696 invoked by uid 1000); 23 Apr 2003 23:27:24 -0000
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 16:27:24 -0700
From: ivan-debian@420.am
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Ron Lee <ron@debian.org>, debian-perl@lists.debian.org
Subject: O: libapache-request-perl
Message-ID: <20030423232724.GE2377@cleanwhisker.420.am>
Mail-Followup-To: ivan-debian@420.am, submit@bugs.debian.org,
Ron Lee <ron@debian.org>, debian-perl@lists.debian.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.9 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,NO_REAL_NAME,SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: wnpp
Maintainer appears to be MIA - has not responded to bug reports on this
package in almost one year.
Orphaning this package so that someone active can take it over. I will
do so if no one else is interested.
--
_ivan
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 190410-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Apr 2003 05:38:21 +0000
>From ron@debian.org Thu Apr 24 00:38:20 2003
Return-path: <ron@debian.org>
Received: from cis54.cyber-dyne.com (hank) [207.189.173.154]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 198ZR5-0004Oq-00; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 00:38:20 -0500
Received: from ron by hank with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 198ZPz-0000LR-00; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 22:37:11 -0700
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 22:37:11 -0700
To: Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@gwolf.cx>
Cc: ivan-debian@420.am, debian-perl@lists.debian.org, ivan@debian.org,
190410-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: O: libapache-request-perl
Message-ID: <20030424053711.GB1163@hank>
References: <20030423232724.GE2377@cleanwhisker.420.am> <20030424001952.GS6561@gwolf.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030424001952.GS6561@gwolf.cx>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
From: Ron <ron@debian.org>
Delivered-To: 190410-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-25.3 required=4.0
tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
QUOTE_TWICE_1,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,
SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID,USER_AGENT_MUTT
autolearn=ham version=2.53
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Howdy,
re:
> > Package: wnpp
> >
> > Maintainer appears to be MIA - has not responded to bug reports on this
> > package in almost one year.
> >
> > Orphaning this package so that someone active can take it over. I will
> > do so if no one else is interested.
I don't know what brand of crack they hand out in hijacking school
these days, or much about this years fashion in diplomacy, but did
you ever think of, uh, asking, before forcibly orphaning someone else's
package or assuming things about them?
This package is perfectly functional in its current form and until your
flurry of 'activity' it had a perfectly functional maintainer keeping it
in the archive. How do you think orphaning it and holding a fire sale
improves on that when noone has ever asked to take it over? There is a
big difference between active and frantic.
On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 07:19:52PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Yup... The package seems quite simple - Ivan, do you want to take it? Do
> you want me to take it? I just got approved into Debian and... Well, I
> am not too busy with the little packages I have ;-)
Gunnar, I'd be delighted if you want to spend time on this package, I've
no real use for it myself anymore, its completely trival, and gets
about 5 emails a year. Mainly it just needs a developer/user if its
to stay up to date. If you're a dd and you'd like to adopt it, you've
got my blessing, I'll presume that unlike some you're still current
with the protocol and know what to do. If you'd like to just NMU and/or
add yourself as comaintainer, I'm cool with that too.
Otherwise this package still has a maintainer, thanks for asking...
Ron
(waiting for the NM with enough insight and humor to request mia@d.o)
Reply to: