Bug#189939: wnpp: O: open-amulet-dev C++ GUI toolkit
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A
Severity: normal
I'm orphaning the amulet packages.
- Jim Van Zandt
dpkg -I open-amulet-dev_4.3.1-7_i386.deb
new debian package, version 2.0.
size 2949442 bytes: control archive= 7003 bytes.
1518 bytes, 34 lines control
14349 bytes, 206 lines md5sums
289 bytes, 9 lines * postinst #!/bin/sh
212 bytes, 7 lines * prerm #!/bin/sh
Package: open-amulet-dev
Version: 4.3.1-7
Section: devel
Priority: optional
Architecture: i386
Depends: libamulet4
Installed-Size: 11024
Maintainer: James R. Van Zandt <jrv@debian.org>
Source: open-amulet
Description: Development files for OpenAmulet, a GUI toolkit
This package contains the header files and the development library
for OpenAmulet. Install this package if you wish to develop your own
programs using the OpenAmulet toolkit.
.
The OpenAmulet Toolkit is a portable toolkit designed for the
creation of 2D direct manipulation graphical user interfaces. It is
written in C++ and can be used with Unix systems running the X Window
System (Motif look), PC's running Microsoft Windows NT or `95 (native
look), or Macintosh systems running MacOS (native look).
.
The Amulet research project in the School of Computer Science at
Carnegie Mellon University is creating a comprehensive set of tools
which make it significantly easier to create graphical,
highly-interactive user interfaces. The lower levels of Amulet are
called the `Amulet Toolkit,' and these provide mechanisms that allow
programmers to code user interfaces much more easily. Support is
provided for: object selection, save/load, undo, and constraints.
.
As the group at Carnegie Mellon University is no longer funded for
its work on Amulet, some Amulet users have founded the OpenAmulet
project which has continued its development.
.
For more information, see http://www.openip.org and
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~amulet/
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux vanzandt 2.4.20 #11 SMP Sat Mar 15 18:43:27 EST 2003 i686 unknown unknown GNU/Linux
Reply to: