And again (sigh). ----- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System <Mailer-Daemon@gluck.debian.org> ----- From: Mail Delivery System <Mailer-Daemon@gluck.debian.org> Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 08:09:12 -0600 To: joey@kitenet.net Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,MAILER_DAEMON, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE autolearn=ham version=2.53 This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (Exim). A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: 180050@bugs.debian.org SMTP error from remote mailer after end of data: host master.debian.org [65.125.64.135]: 451 rejected: can't currently verify any sender in the header lines (envelope sender is <joey@kitenet.net>) - try later: retry timeout exceeded ------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------ Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net> Received: from client132.fre.communitycolo.net (kitenet.net) [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1950QU-00053Y-00; Mon, 14 Apr 2003 03:38:58 -0600 Received: by kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 500) id C4960AA5C1; Sat, 5 Apr 2003 21:19:29 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2003 21:19:29 +0000 From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org> To: nboullis@debian.org, 180050@bugs.debian.org Subject: FWD: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender Message-ID: <20030405211929.GA11165@kitenet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i My reply (see below) was delayed for a while because of suckiness in master.debian.org's mail config. ----- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System <MAILER-DAEMON@kitenet.net> ----- From: Mail Delivery System <MAILER-DAEMON@kitenet.net> Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2003 21:16:02 +0000 (GMT) To: joey@kitenet.net Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,PGP_SIGNATURE,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT version=2.53 Content-Description: Notification This is the Postfix program at host kitenet.net. I'm sorry to have to inform you that the message returned below could not be delivered to one or more destinations. For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster> If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the message returned below. The Postfix program <nboullis@debian.org>: host master.debian.org[65.125.64.135] said: 451 rejected: can't currently verify any sender in the header lines (envelope sender is <joey@kitenet.net>) - try later (in reply to end of DATA command) <180050@bugs.debian.org>: host master.debian.org[65.125.64.135] said: 451 rejected: can't currently verify any sender in the header lines (envelope sender is <joey@kitenet.net>) - try later (in reply to end of DATA command) Content-Description: Delivery error report Reporting-MTA: dns; kitenet.net Arrival-Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 21:10:39 +0000 (GMT) Final-Recipient: rfc822; nboullis@debian.org Action: failed Status: 4.0.0 Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; host master.debian.org[65.125.64.135] said: 451 rejected: can't currently verify any sender in the header lines (envelope sender is <joey@kitenet.net>) - try later (in reply to end of DATA command) Final-Recipient: rfc822; 180050@bugs.debian.org Action: failed Status: 4.0.0 Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; host master.debian.org[65.125.64.135] said: 451 rejected: can't currently verify any sender in the header lines (envelope sender is <joey@kitenet.net>) - try later (in reply to end of DATA command) Content-Description: Undelivered Message From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org> Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 09:41:27 -0800 To: Nicolas Boullis <nboullis@debian.org> Cc: 180050@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#180050: O: isync -- synchronize a local maildir with a remote IMAP4 mailbox Nicolas Boullis wrote: > I might be interrested to take over isync, since I use it. > But as you prefer to use offlineimap rather than isync, I wonder how > both compare. As you have use both, could you tell me how they compare? > And do you know how both compare with mailsync? > > One feature I like in insync is the ability to limit the number of > synchronized messages to a given number, and it seems that this feature > is not available in mailsync/offlineimap. I forget all the reasons I switched to offlineimap (it's been a while), but it seemed like an easier to configure, more powerful, and faster agent to me. Some of the features I like are concurrent syncs, and multiple UI's, and storing the password in a separate file (without nasty hacks), and working out what folders are on the server, instead of having the list them all. The new upstream version of isync I packaged before dropping it was also unfortunatly a bit buggy. mailsync doesn't really compare; it didn't do flag synchronization at all last time I looked at it. It is much more flexible about the formats it can sync though. -- see shy jo ----- End forwarded message ----- -- see shy jo ----- End forwarded message ----- -- see shy jo
Attachment:
pgpX1obOwS1MX.pgp
Description: PGP signature