[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#160394: RFP: x0rfbserver -- Remotely control a user's X desktop



retitle 160394 ITP: rfb -- Remotely control a user's X desktop
thanks

On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 08:49:05PM +0200, Johan Walles wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Version: N/A; reported 2002-09-10
> Severity: wishlist
> 
> * Package name    : x0rfbserver
>   Version         : 0.1.2
>   Upstream Author : Jens Wagner <jwagner@hexonet.de>
> * URL             : http://www.hexonet.de/software/x0rfbserver/index.html
> * License         : GPL
>   Description     : Remotely control a user's X desktop
> 
> >From the web page:
> 
> x0rfbserver is a software application that is able to export an X desktop to
> another machine.  It exports the framebuffer of the X server to one or more
> clients using strong compression and injects keyboard and mouse inputs from the
> clients into the server.  The protocol used is the well documented RFB 3.3
> protocol, so x0rfbserver should be compatible with every client speaking that
> protocol too, e.g. it should work together with the vnc viewers of AT&T.
> 
> x0rfbserver provides a complete remote control of the desktop on the computer it
> is running on.
> 
> -- System Information
> Debian Release: testing/unstable
> Architecture: i386
> Kernel: Linux foo 2.4.17 #1 sön feb 10 09:40:14 CET 2002 i686
> Locale: LANG=sv_SE.ISO8859-1, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.ISO8859-1
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 

-- 
 --------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/  opal@debian.org                     Annebergsslingan 37      \
|  opal@lysator.liu.se                 654 65 KARLSTAD          |
|  +46 (0)54-10 14 30                  +46 (0)70-332 1551       |
|  http://www.opal.dhs.org             UIN/icq: 4912500         |
\  gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36  4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
 ---------------------------------------------------------------



Reply to: