Bug#120905: marked as done (RFA: imp -- IMP webmail program.)
Your message dated Thu, 17 Jan 2002 23:46:26 +0100
with message-id <20020117234626.A2094@chrystal.opal.dhs.org>
and subject line Closed now.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Nov 2001 09:32:21 +0000
>From ola@opal.dhs.org Sat Nov 24 03:32:21 2001
Return-path: <ola@opal.dhs.org>
Received: from p242.linnet.nu (chrystal.opal.dhs.org) [62.13.47.242]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 167ZAb-0005IW-00; Sat, 24 Nov 2001 03:32:21 -0600
Received: from ola by chrystal.opal.dhs.org with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 167ZAV-0007DG-00
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 24 Nov 2001 10:32:15 +0100
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 10:32:15 +0100
From: Ola Lundqvist <opal@debian.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: RFA: imp -- IMP webmail program.
Message-ID: <20011124103215.A27692@chrystal.opal.dhs.org>
Reply-To: opal@debian.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: Ola Lundqvist <ola@opal.dhs.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Hi
I have come to the point where I feel that I can not give the
imp webmail program the time that it should be given. So I have
decided to call for help. I have a lot of ideas but that is more
on the more general basis of web application packaging, not just
the imp package.
If someone do not want to adopt it but just help me maintain it
that is fine too. The problem is mostly the postgres part but
that is a issue of wwwconfig-common which I also call for help of.
Regards,
// Ola
--
--------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/ opal@debian.org Björnkärrsgatan 5 A.11 \
| opal@lysator.liu.se 584 36 LINKÖPING |
| +46 (0)13-17 69 83 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 120905-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jan 2002 22:46:33 +0000
>From ola@opal.dhs.org Thu Jan 17 16:46:33 2002
Return-path: <ola@opal.dhs.org>
Received: from p242.linnet.nu (chrystal.opal.dhs.org) [62.13.47.242]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16RLIn-0006bs-00; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 16:46:33 -0600
Received: from ola by chrystal.opal.dhs.org with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 16RLIg-0000YC-00; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 23:46:26 +0100
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 23:46:26 +0100
From: Ola Lundqvist <opal@debian.org>
To: 120905-done@bugs.debian.org, 120906-done@bugs.debian.org,
debian-imp@opal.dhs.org
Subject: Closed now.
Message-ID: <20020117234626.A2094@chrystal.opal.dhs.org>
Reply-To: opal@debian.org
Mail-Followup-To: Ola Lundqvist <opal@debian.org>,
120905-done@bugs.debian.org, 120906-done@bugs.debian.org,
debian-imp@opal.dhs.org
References: <Pine.LNX.4.43.0201171313430.1872-100000@tpo2.sourcepole> <20020117132703.A28673@chrystal.opal.dhs.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20020117132703.A28673@chrystal.opal.dhs.org>; from opal@debian.org on Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 01:27:03PM +0100
Sender: Ola Lundqvist <ola@opal.dhs.org>
Delivered-To: 120905-done@bugs.debian.org
I think the imp task force have enough people now. At least so I can
close the RFA bugs. :)
Regards,
// Ola
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 01:27:03PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 01:15:32PM +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> > hello Ola,
> >
> > you sent an intent to orphan IMP. Has there been any feedback on this? How
> > about packaging imp3 instead? Any estimate on how much work imp3 would be
> > and how much work maintaining imp is?
> > *t
>
> I think I should close that bug by now because we (4 people) have
> set up a imp task force who are concentrating on fixing bugs and
> to package the next version.
>
> See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=92698&repeatmerged=yes
> for more information.
>
> Regards,
>
> // Ola
>
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Tomas Pospisek
> > sourcepole - Linux & Open Source Solutions
> > http://sourcepole.com
> > Elestastrasse 18, 7310 Bad Ragaz, Switzerland
> > Tel:+41 (81) 330 77 13, Fax:+41 (81) 330 77 12
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
>
> --
> --------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
> / opal@debian.org Björnkärrsgatan 5 A.11 \
> | opal@lysator.liu.se 584 36 LINKÖPING |
> | +46 (0)13-17 69 83 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
> | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
> \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
--
--------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/ opal@debian.org Björnkärrsgatan 5 A.11 \
| opal@lysator.liu.se 584 36 LINKÖPING |
| +46 (0)13-17 69 83 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: