[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#160451: marked as done (RFP: libdc1394-9 -- high level programming interface for IEEE1394 digital camera)



Your message dated Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:15:05 +0100
with message-id <E18SIg4-0001RI-00@localhost>
and subject line Your ITP of libdc1394-9 (#160451)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Sep 2002 02:06:57 +0000
>From ryutaroh@it.ss.titech.ac.jp Tue Sep 10 21:06:56 2002
Return-path: <ryutaroh@it.ss.titech.ac.jp>
Received: from mx1.net.titech.ac.jp [131.112.125.25] 
	by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 17owu8-0002nX-00; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 21:06:56 -0500
Received: (qmail 81114 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2002 02:11:06 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO vc1.net.titech.ac.jp) (131.112.125.35)
  by 0 with SMTP; 11 Sep 2002 02:11:06 -0000
Received: (qmail 11147 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2002 02:08:12 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nuts.it.ss.titech.ac.jp) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 11 Sep 2002 02:08:12 -0000
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 11:06:52 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <20020911.110652.18276901.ryutaroh@it.ss.titech.ac.jp>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: RFP: libdc1394-9 -- high level programming interface for IEEE1394
 digital camera
From: Ryutaroh Matsumoto <ryutaroh@it.ss.titech.ac.jp>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.95b112 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : libdc1394-9
  Version         : 0.9.0-2
  Upstream Author : Dan Dennedy <dan@dennedy.org>
* URL             : http://sourceforge.net/projects/libdc1394
* License         : LGPL
  Description     : high level programming interface for IEEE1394 digital camera

This is a shared library for using IEEE1394 digital camera.

This is a new version of libdc1394 whose API is different from the
existing libdc1394-8 Debian package. I think libdc1394 0.9.0-2 can
coexist with the old libdc1394-8, because its major version of shared
library is changed from libdc1394-8.



Ryutaroh Matsumoto, Ph.D., Research Associate
Department of Communications and Integrated Systems
Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan
Email: ryutaroh@rmatsumoto.org

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 160451-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Dec 2002 15:15:06 +0000
>From bas@iasoon.debian.net Sat Dec 28 09:15:06 2002
Return-path: <bas@iasoon.debian.net>
Received: from smtpzilla2.xs4all.nl [194.109.127.138] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18SIg6-0002rk-00; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 09:15:06 -0600
Received: from localhost (ramstraat29.xs4all.nl [80.126.10.231])
	by smtpzilla2.xs4all.nl (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id gBSFF56v086027
	for <160451-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:15:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bas by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 18SIg4-0001RI-00
	for <160451-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:15:04 +0100
From: Bas Zoetekouw <bas@debian.org>
To: 160451-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Your ITP of libdc1394-9 (#160451)
Message-Id: <E18SIg4-0001RI-00@localhost>
Sender: Bas Zoetekouw <bas@iasoon.debian.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:15:05 +0100
Delivered-To: 160451-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
	tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Hi!

This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of libdc1394-9.
The package libdc1394-9 seems already to be in the archive.
Therefore, I'm closing this bug.

Kind regards,
Bas Zoetekouw.



Reply to: