[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#166553: marked as done (ITP: libfile-which-perl -- Perl module for searching paths for executable programs)



Your message dated Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:11:58 -0500
with message-id <E186aqM-0006OI-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#166553: fixed in libfile-which-perl 0.05-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Oct 2002 01:29:38 +0000
>From ardo@enteract.com Sat Oct 26 20:29:37 2002
Return-path: <ardo@enteract.com>
Received: from smtp-1.enteract.com [207.229.143.33] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 185cFE-0002R0-00; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 20:29:36 -0500
Received: from work-perl.middle-earth (216-80-74-14.d.enteract.com [216.80.74.14])
	by smtp-1.enteract.com (Postfix) with SMTP
	id CDC6A720C; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 20:29:34 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by work-perl.middle-earth (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 26 Oct 2002 20:29:33 -0500
From: "Ardo van Rangelrooij" <ardo@enteract.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: ITP: libfile-which-perl -- Perl module for searching paths for
	executable programs
Reply-To: Ardo van Rangelrooij <ardo@debian.org>
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.8
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 20:29:33 -0500
Message-Id: <[🔎] 20021027012934.CDC6A720C@smtp-1.enteract.com>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
	tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-10-26
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : libfile-which-perl
  Version         : 0.05
  Upstream Author : Per Einar Ellefsen <per.einar@skynet.be>
* URL             : http://www.cpan.org/
* License         : Artistic
  Description     : Perl module for searching paths for executable programs

This module searches the directories of the user's PATH (as returned
by File::Spec->path()), looking for executable files having the name
specified as a parameter to which().

(This module is needed by the latest version of I18N::Charset.)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux rohan 2.4.18 #1 Sun Jul 14 11:28:54 CDT 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 166553-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Oct 2002 18:28:52 +0000
>From troup@auric.debian.org Tue Oct 29 12:28:51 2002
Return-path: <troup@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 186b6h-00073z-00; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 12:28:51 -0600
Received: from troup by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 186aqM-0006OI-00; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:11:58 -0500
From: Ardo van Rangelrooij <ardo@debian.org>
To: 166553-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.19 $
Subject: Bug#166553: fixed in libfile-which-perl 0.05-1
Message-Id: <E186aqM-0006OI-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: James Troup <troup@auric.debian.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:11:58 -0500
Delivered-To: 166553-close@bugs.debian.org

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libfile-which-perl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libfile-which-perl_0.05-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libf/libfile-which-perl/libfile-which-perl_0.05-1.diff.gz
libfile-which-perl_0.05-1.dsc
  to pool/main/libf/libfile-which-perl/libfile-which-perl_0.05-1.dsc
libfile-which-perl_0.05-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/libf/libfile-which-perl/libfile-which-perl_0.05-1_all.deb
libfile-which-perl_0.05.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/libf/libfile-which-perl/libfile-which-perl_0.05.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 166553@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ardo van Rangelrooij <ardo@debian.org> (supplier of updated libfile-which-perl package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 20:46:13 -0500
Source: libfile-which-perl
Binary: libfile-which-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.05-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ardo van Rangelrooij <ardo@debian.org>
Changed-By: Ardo van Rangelrooij <ardo@debian.org>
Description: 
 libfile-which-perl - Perl module for searching paths for executable programs
Closes: 166553
Changes: 
 libfile-which-perl (0.05-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial Release
     (closes: Bug#166553)
Files: 
 fdf5258d062912fde9d7a2d86c8544dd 722 interpreters optional libfile-which-perl_0.05-1.dsc
 bd671a65f770fc0a124095e74c7c8013 7264 interpreters optional libfile-which-perl_0.05.orig.tar.gz
 fccb34120f48f669c503beb0645e5e11 1335 interpreters optional libfile-which-perl_0.05-1.diff.gz
 ec9e51006bfa2e729750bb3669b948a7 11512 interpreters optional libfile-which-perl_0.05-1_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)

iQCVAwUBPbtHhj6XMRfcxSjpAQEkkwP/eFDreYmPpeUkeviyovlb57k5LGFh7AAi
41IjiHpIwlOe4yKuffbVSEQbW/tL6Ofmtk/MO4t64mt8TQGpCdz4mLRHvrHLmnaK
rVTALToQJn5LfC0SV1F1OBz2npeS7E/ukV2FJ3I1MRNGSMPjR+A86PoZ1NH63E0L
ORRxZD9HRhw=
=uHIe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: