Bug#123887: [Evms-devel] Upcoming release
On Monday 14 January 2002 17:13, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 08:02:19AM -0600, Kevin Corry wrote:
> > Just for reference, which version of LVM are you running, and which
> > version of EVMS are you going to try? 0.2.4 is our latest release. CVS
> > has a number of fixes since 0.2.4, and we are hoping to release 0.9.0
> > real soon.
>
> Will 0.9.0 include the soname changes necessary for the Debian packages of
> EVMS? I'm eager to resume work on them.
Hi Matt,
I have given versioned soname's to libevms and libdlist. I just made up
version 1.0 for dlist, since it should never change in an incompatible way.
libevms will use the current EVMS major number in its soname, unless we can
think of a better method in the future.
Thanks again for all the libtool work. I think for the time being, though,
that it's a bit much to add. I think once we get our 1.0 release out this
spring, I will revisit the libtool/automake setup as a post-1.0 addition. For
now we are just using -soname option to the linker to get the appropriate
versions set in the shared libraries.
Also, is it necessary to include versioned sonames for the plugin libraries?
As I've mentioned before, no executables should be linking against these
libraries - they are just meant to be loaded directly by the core engine. I
can add versions if necessary - I don't think it will break anything - but it
is not set up that way at the moment.
-Kevin
Reply to: