[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#120155: marked as done (ITP: libopenssl-ruby - OpenSSL interface for Ruby)



Your message dated Thu, 29 Nov 2001 20:53:31 +0100
with message-id <E169XFT-0002zI-00@pandora.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#120155: fixed in libopenssl-ruby 0.0.9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Nov 2001 01:29:37 +0000
>From akira@arika.org Sun Nov 18 19:29:37 2001
Return-path: <akira@arika.org>
Received: from rb.webmasters.gr.jp (rb.arika.org) [211.18.217.219] (postfix)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 165dFg-00062S-00; Sun, 18 Nov 2001 19:29:37 -0600
Received: from ruby.p.arika.org (rb.arika.org [211.18.217.219])
	by rb.arika.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 324C13546D
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 19 Nov 2001 10:29:34 +0900 (JST)
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 10:29:22 +0900
From: akira yamada / =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCJGQkXiRAJCIkLSRpGyhC?= <akira@debian.org>
To: submit <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: ITP: libopenssl-ruby - OpenSSL interface for Ruby
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.6.0 (Twist And Shout) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.1
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Organization: Debian Project
X-GPG-Fingerprint: 2A0D D68A 6578 43B6 0C72  C59B 5F39 31A6 E213 F1A0
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 29 B3 FB BA 12 99 C6 B6  AE 39 DB 39 21 6E 63 36
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Message-Id: <[🔎] 20011119012934.324C13546D@rb.arika.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

Package name:
  libopenssl-ruby

Homepage:
  http://www.freesoftware.fsf.org/rubypki/

Description:
  OpenSSL interface for Ruby.
  SSLSocket (known as libssl-ruby) were merged in it.

License:
  Ruby's

Ruby's License:
  Ruby is copyrighted free software by Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@netlab.co.jp>.
  You can redistribute it and/or modify it under either the terms of the GPL
  (see COPYING file), or the conditions below:

    1. You may make and give away verbatim copies of the source form of the
       software without restriction, provided that you duplicate all of the
       original copyright notices and associated disclaimers.

    2. You may modify your copy of the software in any way, provided that
       you do at least ONE of the following:

	 a) place your modifications in the Public Domain or otherwise
	    make them Freely Available, such as by posting said
	    modifications to Usenet or an equivalent medium, or by allowing
	    the author to include your modifications in the software.

	 b) use the modified software only within your corporation or
	    organization.

	 c) rename any non-standard executables so the names do not conflict
	    with standard executables, which must also be provided.

	 d) make other distribution arrangements with the author.

    3. You may distribute the software in object code or executable
       form, provided that you do at least ONE of the following:

	 a) distribute the executables and library files of the software,
	    together with instructions (in the manual page or equivalent)
	    on where to get the original distribution.

	 b) accompany the distribution with the machine-readable source of
	    the software.

	 c) give non-standard executables non-standard names, with
	    instructions on where to get the original software distribution.

	 d) make other distribution arrangements with the author.

    4. You may modify and include the part of the software into any other
       software (possibly commercial).  But some files in the distribution
       are not written by the author, so that they are not under this terms.
       They are gc.c(partly), utils.c(partly), regex.[ch], fnmatch.[ch],
       glob.c, st.[ch] and some files under the ./missing directory.  See
       each file for the copying condition.

    5. The scripts and library files supplied as input to or produced as 
       output from the software do not automatically fall under the
       copyright of the software, but belong to whomever generated them, 
       and may be sold commercially, and may be aggregated with this
       software.

    6. THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND WITHOUT ANY EXPRESS OR
       IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE IMPLIED
       WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
       PURPOSE.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 120155-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Nov 2001 20:11:52 +0000
>From troup@pandora.debian.org Thu Nov 29 14:11:52 2001
Return-path: <troup@pandora.debian.org>
Received: from pandora.debian.org [132.229.137.249] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 169XXE-0005XH-00; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 14:11:52 -0600
Received: from troup by pandora.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 169XFT-0002zI-00; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 20:53:31 +0100
From: akira yamada <akira@debian.org>
To: 120155-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.66 $
Subject: Bug#120155: fixed in libopenssl-ruby 0.0.9-1
Message-Id: <E169XFT-0002zI-00@pandora.debian.org>
Sender: James Troup <troup@pandora.debian.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 20:53:31 +0100
Delivered-To: 120155-close@bugs.debian.org

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libopenssl-ruby, which has been installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libopenssl-ruby_0.0.9-1.diff.gz
  to pool/non-US/main/libo/libopenssl-ruby/libopenssl-ruby_0.0.9-1.diff.gz
libopenssl-ruby_0.0.9-1.dsc
  to pool/non-US/main/libo/libopenssl-ruby/libopenssl-ruby_0.0.9-1.dsc
libopenssl-ruby_0.0.9-1_i386.deb
  to pool/non-US/main/libo/libopenssl-ruby/libopenssl-ruby_0.0.9-1_i386.deb
libopenssl-ruby_0.0.9.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/non-US/main/libo/libopenssl-ruby/libopenssl-ruby_0.0.9.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 120155@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
akira yamada <akira@debian.org> (supplier of updated libopenssl-ruby package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 11:49:44 +0900
Source: libopenssl-ruby
Binary: libopenssl-ruby
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.0.9-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: akira yamada <akira@debian.org>
Changed-By: akira yamada <akira@debian.org>
Description: 
 libopenssl-ruby - OpenSSL interface for scripting language Ruby.
Closes: 120155
Changes: 
 libopenssl-ruby (0.0.9-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial Release. closes: #120155.
Files: 
 e697f04cfe58fded99e390bd40ffa2c9 700 non-US/main optional libopenssl-ruby_0.0.9-1.dsc
 b55bf5436cdc5cbd87839135ac078913 73816 non-US/main optional libopenssl-ruby_0.0.9.orig.tar.gz
 0ce4de793dbf57d1e28ad6d2549d41f8 2603 non-US/main optional libopenssl-ruby_0.0.9-1.diff.gz
 988e7cea562a30470fcfb74eb2a58d31 76522 non-US/main optional libopenssl-ruby_0.0.9-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: KUHASIKU WA http://www.gnupg.org/ WO GORANKUDASAI

iD8DBQE7/w7GXzkxpuIT8aARAtWZAJ4lOfCFOTTAWsLH6BERX6398IadpQCeLS+z
h5qBpss2X+lN/lJ+wZIYWbU=
=rC5I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: