Bug#93337: Do you still intend to adopt acm?

To: Colin Watson <cjw44@flatline.org.uk>
Cc: <93337@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Bug#93337: Do you still intend to adopt acm?
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 01:26:36 +0200 (CEST)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.33.0106030124260.8236-100000@r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de>
Reply-to: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>, 93337@bugs.debian.org

Hi Colin,

1,5 months ago you retitled this WNPP bug to show that you intend to adopt
acm. Is this still valid?

If yes, please upload a new package that fixes #95137.

If no, plese retitle the WNPP bug back to "O:".


Thanks in advance
Adrian

-- 
A "No" uttered from deepest conviction is better and greater than a
"Yes" merely uttered to please, or what is worse, to avoid trouble.
                -- Mahatma Ghandi

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#93337: Do you still intend to adopt acm?
  - From: Colin Watson <cjw44@flatline.org.uk>

Prev by Date: Bug#68311: Do you still intend to adopt dstooltk(-doc)?
Next by Date: Bug#99755: ITP: mosix0.98 -- ITP: mosix0.98 -- mosix for the 2.2.19 kernels.
Previous by thread: Bug#68311: Do you still intend to adopt dstooltk(-doc)?
Next by thread: Bug#93337: Do you still intend to adopt acm?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread