Bug#122929: wpoison, is it okay?
"Sunnanvind" <email@example.com> writes:
> Re-read. It says "image should be inside the hyperlink", not the other
> way around.
You're right, but it still seems to prohibit any kind of distribution
which is not by hyperlinks that include their logo. That's not
trademark protection, it's rather a kind of forced advertising.
Unlike the noxious BSD advertising clause, however, it actually
requires the advertising, and as such, is non-free.
It seems to me that we cannot even distribute it in the nonfree