Bug#122929: wpoison, is it okay?

[tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)]

"Sunnanvind" <sunnanvind@fenderson.com> writes:

> Re-read. It says "image should be inside the hyperlink", not the other 
> way around.

You're right, but it still seems to prohibit any kind of distribution
which is not by hyperlinks that include their logo.  That's not
trademark protection, it's rather a kind of forced advertising.
Unlike the noxious BSD advertising clause, however, it actually
requires the advertising, and as such, is non-free.

It seems to me that we cannot even distribute it in the nonfree
archive.