Bug#92220: Is it really needed to package the Contents-* files?

To: Piotr Krukowiecki <piotr@pingu.ii.uj.edu.pl>
Cc: 92220@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#92220: Is it really needed to package the Contents-* files?
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 20:00:19 +0100 (CET)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.NEB.4.40.0111171955080.1323-100000@mimas.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de>
Reply-to: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>, 92220@bugs.debian.org

Hi Piotr,

some time ago you suggested to package the Contents-* files. Since noone
wants to package them and it seems a bit impractical to package the new
files every day I'd like to ask you whether it's acceptable for you to
close this RFP (if you do always want the current Contents-* files you
can e.g. use a cron job on your local machine that fetches daily or
weekly the latest ones).

cu
Adrian

-- 

Get my GPG key: finger bunk@debian.org | gpg --import

Fingerprint: B29C E71E FE19 6755 5C8A  84D4 99FC EA98 4F12 B400

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#92220: Is it really needed to package the Contents-* files?
  - From: Piotr Krukowiecki <piotr@pingu.ii.uj.edu.pl>

Prev by Date: Bug#119980: [ITP]: libxml-sax-perl -- Perl module for using and building Perl SAX2 XML processors
Next by Date: Processed: wnpp cleanup
Previous by thread: Bug#119980: [ITP]: libxml-sax-perl -- Perl module for using and building Perl SAX2 XML processors
Next by thread: Bug#92220: Is it really needed to package the Contents-* files?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread