Bug#68311: dstooltk
On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Colin Watson wrote:
> I've been looking through packages that are in need of /usr/doc and
> /usr/man updates and that would benefit from Debian QA uploads, and
> dstooltk/dstooltk-doc were two of them. You said two months ago that you
> were intending to adopt dstooltk{,-doc} - is this still the case?
Yes, that's still the case. Basically I have a dstooltk deb ready, but it
still needs a bit of tinkering. The idea is now to get it similar to
octave, i.e. dstooltk, dstooltk-headers, dstooltk-static and dstooltk-doc,
since a very useful capibility from dstool is to link in user supplied
code and this was missing in John Lapeyre's package. The source can all go
into the same package pool.
I could do dstooltk-doc quite quickly.
> Do you need a sponsor for this package?
Yes I do. I'll have everything ready in a couple of days - at least
before next Sunday.
But I have not applied to the new maintainer scheme yet, I'll have to look
at that, getting a signed GNUPG key and things like that.
Bart
Reply to: