Bug#1101105: libwine: WINE_FONT_DIR wrong because path has wine appended
Package: libwine
Version: 8.0~repack-4
Severity: important
Tags:
X-Debbugs-Cc: libv@skynet.be
Dear Maintainer,
Installshield-3.0 shows a weird font when using the official debian
package (and built debian packages), whereas directly built wine runs
fine. This weird font means that some input fields requiring a specific
number of digits are not accepting the correct number of digits due to
font sizing/spacing (great design!), so installshield complains about
the wrong number of digits.
The wine trace shows that "MS Sans Serif" cannot be located. Wine is not
finding the fonts in /usr/share/wine/fonts/ and the cause is
get_fonts_data_dir_path() returning:
L"\\??\\Z:\\usr\\share\\wine\\../fonts\"
This extra "../" is out of place as the actual path is
"/usr/share/wine/fonts".
This is caused by dlls/win32u/Makefile.in:
font_EXTRADEFS = -DWINE_FONT_DIR=\"`${MAKEDEP} -R ${datadir}/wine ${fontdir}`\"
with datadir set to "/usr/lib/wine/../../share/wine" and fontdir being
set to "/usr/share/wine/fonts". The extra "wine" means that
WINE_FONT_DIR then becomes "../fonts".
This is the issue that patches/debianization/install-paths.patch was
supposed to solve, but dlls/win32u/Makefile.in was overlooked, whereas
dlls/ntdll/Makefile.in and libs/wine/Makefile.in were altered.
This issue has been fixed for testing:
https://sources.debian.org/patches/wine/9.0~repack-7/debianization/install-paths.patch/#L45
But remains in stable.
A small tool has been written to list fonts in win16 and winnt
environments: https://github.com/libv/enumfontfamilies
-- Package-specific info:
/usr/bin/wine does not exist.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.9
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-30-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages libwine depends on:
ii libasound2 1.2.8-1+b1
ii libc6 2.36-9+deb12u9
ii libcapi20-3 1:3.27-3+b1
ii libfontconfig1 2.14.1-4
ii libfreetype6 2.12.1+dfsg-5+deb12u3
ii libglib2.0-0 2.74.6-2+deb12u5
ii libgphoto2-6 2.5.30-1
ii libgphoto2-port12 2.5.30-1
ii libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-0 1.22.0-3+deb12u4
ii libgstreamer1.0-0 1.22.0-2+deb12u1
ii libpcap0.8 1.10.3-1
ii libpulse0 16.1+dfsg1-2+b1
ii libudev1 252.33-1~deb12u1
ii libusb-1.0-0 2:1.0.26-1
ii libx11-6 2:1.8.4-2+deb12u2
ii libxext6 2:1.3.4-1+b1
ii libz-mingw-w64 1.2.13+dfsg-1
ii ocl-icd-libopencl1 [libopencl1] 2.3.1-1
Versions of packages libwine recommends:
ii fonts-liberation 1:1.07.4-11
ii fonts-wine 8.0~repack-4
ii gstreamer1.0-plugins-good 1.22.0-5+deb12u2
ii libasound2-plugins 1.2.7.1-1
ii libcups2 2.4.2-3+deb12u8
ii libdbus-1-3 1.14.10-1~deb12u1
ii libgl1 1.6.0-1
ii libgl1-mesa-dri 22.3.6-1+deb12u1
ii libgnutls30 3.7.9-2+deb12u4
ii libgssapi-krb5-2 1.20.1-2+deb12u2
ii libkrb5-3 1.20.1-2+deb12u2
ii libodbc2 2.3.11-2+deb12u1
ii libosmesa6 22.3.6-1+deb12u1
ii libsdl2-2.0-0 2.26.5+dfsg-1
ii libv4l-0 1.22.1-5+b2
ii libvulkan1 1.3.239.0-1
ii libxcomposite1 1:0.4.5-1
ii libxcursor1 1:1.2.1-1
ii libxfixes3 1:6.0.0-2
ii libxi6 2:1.8-1+b1
ii libxinerama1 2:1.1.4-3
ii libxrandr2 2:1.5.2-2+b1
ii libxrender1 1:0.9.10-1.1
ii libxxf86vm1 1:1.1.4-1+b2
Versions of packages libwine suggests:
pn cups-bsd <none>
ii gstreamer1.0-libav 1.22.0-2
ii gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad 1.22.0-4+deb12u5
ii gstreamer1.0-plugins-ugly 1.22.0-2+deb12u1
pn ttf-mscorefonts-installer <none>
Versions of packages wine32 depends on:
ii libc6 2.36-9+deb12u9
Versions of packages wine32 recommends:
pn wine <none>
Versions of packages wine32 suggests:
pn wine32-preloader <none>
Versions of packages libwine is related to:
pn dxvk <none>
pn dxvk-wine32-development <none>
pn dxvk-wine64-development <none>
ii fonts-wine 8.0~repack-4
-- no debconf information
Reply to: