[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[pkg-wine-party] Bug#809904: marked as done (wine-development: FTBFS with libpng16)



Your message dated Sun, 24 Jan 2016 19:56:44 +0100
with message-id <1453661804.20872.1.camel@debian.org>
and subject line Re: ug#809904: wine-development: FTBFS with libpng16
has caused the Debian Bug report #809904,
regarding wine-development: FTBFS with libpng16
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
809904: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=809904
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: wine-development
Severity: important
User: libpng@packages.debian.org
Usertags: libpng16-transition

Dear wine-development maintainer,

Currently we are preparing the transistion of libpng1.2 to libpng1.6.
The transistion bug is #650601.

A rebuilt of all packages depending on libpng-dev and libpng12-dev
has been done. The result with buildlogs can be found here:
https://libpng.sviech.de/

wine-development FTBFS during this rebuild. The buildlog is available
at https://libpng.sviech.de/wine-development.build

The Titanpad at https://titanpad.com/libpng16-transistion might give
you clues about what went wrong as well as some recipes/pointers how
to fix them. Please feel free to amend the information on the pad as
you might see fit. A plain-text, non java-script version is here:
https://titanpad.com/ep/pad/export/libpng16-transistion/latest 

Please try to make wine-development compatible with libpng16 and then
make sure to B-D on libpng-dev only, if the fix makes it possible to
compile it against libdev12 and libdev16. If you can only make in a
non-backward compatible way, please B-D on libpng16-dev. 

This bug will become RC as soon as the transistion starts.

Best regards, 
-- 
tobi

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Only building arch-depending packages works, so closing this bug.

-- 
Tobi

On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 20:15:59 +0100 Jens Reyer <jre.winesim@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On 01/11/2016 07:48 AM, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > Control: Block -1 by 809125
> > 
> > I guess this bug is actually #809125, not induced by libpng; it
also
> > fails in sid.
> 
> Indeed. You may simply test building only the arch specific packages
> (-B), this is what would happen for a binNMU, wouldn't it?
> 
> Since wine passes the test now, I'm quite sure that there is no
libpng16
> problem in wine-development. There is only one month upstream
> development between them, and I'm not aware of any relevant changes
in
> Debian. Of course we still need to verify that by testing.
> 
> 

--- End Message ---

Reply to: