[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[pkg-wine-party] Bug#775529: marked as done ([wine-development] Please keep in pace with upstream development)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jan 2015 16:55:58 +0100
with message-id <20150117165558.5f46df1f@heffalump.sk2.org>
and subject line Re: [pkg-wine-party] Bug#775529: [wine-development] Please keep in pace with upstream development
has caused the Debian Bug report #775529,
regarding [wine-development] Please keep in pace with upstream development
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
775529: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=775529
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wine-development
Version: 1.7.29-4
Severity: wishlist

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Dear maintainers:

Regarding Debian policy I really do not know how difficult is to follow the bi-
weekly development upstream releases of Wine but I find five numbers out are a 
bit of outdate for the unstable branch IMHO. Maybe it should be in a kind of 
"volatile" branch? 

Best regards,
Antonio

--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel:       Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64

Debian Release: 8.0
  900 testing         security.debian.org 
  900 testing         ftp.es.debian.org 
  800 stable          update.devolo.com 
  800 stable          dl.google.com 
  500 unstable        ftp.es.debian.org 
  500 sid             linux.dropbox.com 

--- Package information. ---
Depends                     (Version) | Installed
=====================================-+-===============
wine64-development     (>= 1.7.25-1)  | 1.7.29-4
 OR wine32-development  (>= 1.7.25-1) | 1.7.29-4


Package's Recommends field is empty.

Suggests                       (Version) | Installed
========================================-+-===========
wine-doc                                 | 
binfmt-support                           | 2.1.5-1
ttf-mscorefonts-installer                | 3.6

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi Antonio,

On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 20:52:40 +0000, Antonio Marcos López Alonso
<amlopezalonso@gmail.com> wrote:
> Regarding Debian policy I really do not know how difficult is to follow the
> bi- weekly development upstream releases of Wine but I find five numbers
> out are a bit of outdate for the unstable branch IMHO. Maybe it should be
> in a kind of "volatile" branch? 

The testing distribution is currently frozen in preparation for the
forthcoming release of Jessie, and it's generally considered best practice to
avoid updating packages in unstable when testing is frozen (it makes updates
to testing easier, should they become necessary). That's why you only have
wine-development 1.7.29.

Michael has nevertheless been keeping up with the upstream releases, and you
can install wine-development 1.7.34 from experimental.

Regards,

Stephen

Attachment: pgpVAyWiFa86R.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: