Re: [pkg-wine-party] Is it really a good idea to remove /usr/share/wine/fonts/*.fon ?

To: pkg-wine-party@lists.alioth.debian.org
Subject: Re: [pkg-wine-party] Is it really a good idea to remove /usr/share/wine/fonts/*.fon ?
From: Hilko Bengen <bengen@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 00:31:20 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 1339281081-27823-1-git-send-email-bengen@debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] CANTw=MONAHaRyJnpkrM9-R0o47UfDMC3x+uWsgTFTCL2ZpzmPw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] CANTw=MONAHaRyJnpkrM9-R0o47UfDMC3x+uWsgTFTCL2ZpzmPw@mail.gmail.com>

Here is a patch to stnt2fnt.c that causes it to produce the same *.fon
files on i386 and powerpc.

Cheers,
-Hilko

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- [pkg-wine-party] [PATCH] sfnt2fnt: Fix broken .fon files on architectures that are big-endian or where char is unsigned.
  - From: Hilko Bengen <bengen@debian.org>

References:
- Re: [pkg-wine-party] Is it really a good idea to remove /usr/share/wine/fonts/*.fon ?
  - From: Michael Gilbert <michael.s.gilbert@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: [pkg-wine-party] Bug#676457: migration path from non multiarch to multiarch wine
Next by Date: [pkg-wine-party] [PATCH] sfnt2fnt: Fix broken .fon files on architectures that are big-endian or where char is unsigned.
Previous by thread: Re: [pkg-wine-party] Is it really a good idea to remove /usr/share/wine/fonts/*.fon ?
Next by thread: [pkg-wine-party] [PATCH] sfnt2fnt: Fix broken .fon files on architectures that are big-endian or where char is unsigned.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread