[pkg-wine-party] Bug#678507: Bug#678507: wine-bin: zlib1g:i386 : Breaks: zlib1g (!= 1:1.2.7.dfsg-11) but 1:1.2.7.dfsg-11+b1 is installed.

To: Sthu <sthu.deus@gmail.com>
Cc: control@bugs.debian.org, 678507@bugs.debian.org
Subject: [pkg-wine-party] Bug#678507: Bug#678507: wine-bin: zlib1g:i386 : Breaks: zlib1g (!= 1:1.2.7.dfsg-11) but 1:1.2.7.dfsg-11+b1 is installed.
From: Hilko Bengen <bengen@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:17:37 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 877guzvbn2.fsf@msgid.hilluzination.de>
Reply-to: Hilko Bengen <bengen@debian.org>, 678507@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20120622095809.22960.97711.reportbug@STNhome> (Sthu's message of "Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:58:09 +0700")
References: <[🔎] 20120622095809.22960.97711.reportbug@STNhome>

reassign 678507 zlib1g
thank you

Apparently, this problem is not caused by wine but by a zlib1g rebuild
that broke i386/amd64 co-installability.

Cheers,
-Hilko

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- [pkg-wine-party] Processed: Re: Bug#678507: wine-bin: zlib1g:i386 : Breaks: zlib1g (!= 1:1.2.7.dfsg-11) but 1:1.2.7.dfsg-11+b1 is installed.
  - From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)

References:
- [pkg-wine-party] Bug#678507: wine-bin: zlib1g:i386 : Breaks: zlib1g (!= 1:1.2.7.dfsg-11) but 1:1.2.7.dfsg-11+b1 is installed.
  - From: Sthu <sthu.deus@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: [pkg-wine-party] Bug#678507: wine-bin: zlib1g:i386 : Breaks: zlib1g (!= 1:1.2.7.dfsg-11) but 1:1.2.7.dfsg-11+b1 is installed.
Next by Date: [pkg-wine-party] Processed: Re: Bug#678507: wine-bin: zlib1g:i386 : Breaks: zlib1g (!= 1:1.2.7.dfsg-11) but 1:1.2.7.dfsg-11+b1 is installed.
Previous by thread: [pkg-wine-party] Bug#678507: wine-bin: zlib1g:i386 : Breaks: zlib1g (!= 1:1.2.7.dfsg-11) but 1:1.2.7.dfsg-11+b1 is installed.
Next by thread: [pkg-wine-party] Processed: Re: Bug#678507: wine-bin: zlib1g:i386 : Breaks: zlib1g (!= 1:1.2.7.dfsg-11) but 1:1.2.7.dfsg-11+b1 is installed.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread