Re: Glibc for win32
Christopher Faylor <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 02:17:17PM +0200, Per Abrahamsen wrote:
>>Christopher Faylor <email@example.com> writes:
>>>There is 0% chance that a glibc-for-windows port would be accepted back
>>>into the main glibc base so
>>Why do you think so?
> The glibc maintainers have no interest in enabling win32 as a platform.
I'm looking more for answer like "Ulrich Drepper told me in private
mail that w32 support would go in over his dead body" rather than just
a repeat of the assertion with other words.