sean finney wrote: > -- pear, pecl, and php policy -- > > afaik the pear/pecl situation is still really messy wrt debian php > library/extension packages vs locally installed extensions. it's been > so long that i don't even remember what was recommended in the php > policy draft, nor do i remember what was and was not implemented. > > this needs revisiting, and ideally some consensus/reminders on what > needs to be done. Hey, the issue of how to deal with pear packages which are installed local has also been on my mind. When finishing the adoption of the pear packages this will be one topic I'll deal with. Since I use the pear command in debian/rules I could add a test to see if a local version of the package is already installed...or something like this. bye, Martin -- Powered by Debian GNU / Linux Browse my blog on http://blog.mein-horde.de
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature