On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:38:22AM -0400, Charles Fry wrote: > Hi, > > Currently PHP Pear modules are named php-<name>. Since these modules are > actually libraries would it not be more appropriate for them to be named > lib<name>-php, as is done with Perl and Java libraries (and perhaps > others)? It's more like a matter of taste. The python stuff is called python-<name>. On the other hand there are already libphp-<name> packages. Would that be another option? We may also consider that from a users point of view a pecl extension isn't much different from a pear package. So, should pecl extensions also be called lib<name>-php? I always found the name php-<name> and php[4|5]-<name> very consitent, but I also wouldn't mind to use another naming schema. Uwe -- MMK GmbH, Fleyer Str. 196, 58097 Hagen Uwe.Steinmann@mmk-hagen.de Tel: +2331 840446 Fax: +2331 843920
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature