Le Lundi 16 Mai 2005 12:06, Alexis Sukrieh a écrit : > I'm also wondering what is the best severity for bugs like "Your foo > webapp package does not provide any Virtual Hosting facility". I believe this is a valid grief agains a webapp. any webapp should be able to live as a vhost, as well as a "standalone" app under a specific directory. This should be at least forwarded upstream. > Note that the bugzilla's one is currently marked as 'important'. In the current state, I believe important is the right severity. this would be serious if we state in the webapp policy that a webapp SHOULD provide vhost facilities. I don't know how many webapps don't cope with vhost very well. But most of the time, it's really easy to fix. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O OOO http://www.madism.org
Attachment:
pgpRnBvPPU3pq.pgp
Description: PGP signature