On 31.05.20 19:14, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > I can't help bug ask, but… > >> aboot: alpha # alpha boot loader >> %arcboot: mips # mips boot loader >> -fdflush: alpha i386 # i386/alpha specific >> +fdflush: alpha amd64 i386 # amd64/i386/alpha specific >> %gpart: i386 hurd-i386 ia64 alpha arm armel mipsel amd64 # little endian specific >> %libgcr410: i386 amd64 # [ANAIS] >> %linux-wlan-ng: amd64 i386 powerpc arm armel armhf alpha hppa lpia # ANAIS [?] > > why not just use the proper Architecture: line in those packages, > instead of keeping this (for many newer people little known) list? > > I can barely understand the negative entries (like the !s390x for > xorg-*), but for everything else it makes little sense to me. That package is so old that the source package does not carry an explicit architecture list. For all that do, the lines in P-a-s should indeed be deleted. But right now that's a manual task that's infrequently done and slightly annoying to automate. Kind regards Philipp Kern
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature