On 02/09/2018 05:52 AM, Mattias Ellert wrote: > There was recently a binmnu rebuild of srm-ifce and lcgdm due to the > gsoap transition. This rebuild failed on some architectures. > > The reason for the failure is a build order dependency. The cgsi-gsoap > package, which was also rebuilt for the gsoap transition, is also a > build requirement for srm-ifce and lcgdm, and in order for the srm-ifce > and lcgdm builds to succeed, the cgsi-gsoap build must be done first. > > This ordering requirement was not taken into account for the binnmus > triggered by the transition, and depending on whether the cgsi-gsoap > build happened first or not on a given architecture, some srm-ifce and > lcgdm failed and some succeeded. > > The cgsi-gsoap binnmus are now completed, so giving back the failed > binnmus for srm-ifce and lcgdm should succeed. > > Requested givebacks for srm-ifce: > > arm64 > armel > armhf > i386 > mips > mips64el > mipsel > ppc64el > s390x > hurd-i386 > powerpc > > Requested givebacks for lcgdm: > > amd64 > arm64 > armel > armhf > i386 > mips > mipsel > ppc64el > s390x > hurd-i386 > powerpc I find it a little odd that this is then not expressed by some sort of library dependency, but okay. I scheduled these. It might make sense to follow up with the Release team next time. Kind regards Philipp Kern
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature