Re: Bug#867104: wanna-build issue with src:perl versioned Provides
- To: Niko Tyni <ntyni@debian.org>
- Cc: Ralf Treinen <treinen@free.fr>, debian-wb-team@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#867104: wanna-build issue with src:perl versioned Provides
- From: Ralf Treinen <treinen@free.fr>
- Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 08:17:03 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20170801061703.pfh72k4dnvzh5pzw@seneca.home.org>
- In-reply-to: <20170731163022.dgiqnj3evy66puae@estella.local.invalid>
- References: <20170703202130.w6t6rzvbl5v25qgg@estella.local.invalid> <20170703203955.z3altx7fx3rwqosp@roeckx.be> <20170703210904.lrc7ke3oiv2rwhti@estella.local.invalid> <20170719100347.nmocxfeuyvx6atv5@seneca.home.org> <20170720180434.cdqgn2v3zupza45p@estella.local.invalid> <20170720192355.mk4ul7lnmxo6km5t@mapreri.org> <20170727131514.4pia3aovqu3fgzta@aurel32.net> <20170731141623.ifxpsqraqx7437yr@mapreri.org> <20170731163022.dgiqnj3evy66puae@estella.local.invalid>
Hello,
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 07:30:22PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 04:16:25PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 03:15:14PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > > 1. upload to stretch, upgrade wuiet to stretch
> > >
> > > I plan to upgrade wuiet to stretch during debconf, but not before. Note
> > > anyway that going through stretch means waiting for the next point
> > > release.
> >
> > I don't believe waiting for the next point release would be so bad
> > anyway. It probably means less than 2 months, this change waited for
> > quite longer…
> > Also, couldn't you install it from stretch-pu?
> >
> > > > 3. upload to stretch-bpo, upgrade wuiet to stretch
> > >
> > > That also works and might be faster. It means we need to try to keep as
> > > much as possible the interface unchanged to not get any breakage.
> >
> > That, and it would need be kept up to date in backports to comply with
> > backport's rules.
> >
> >
> > Overall I think that 1 is the best choice for everything, but then it
> > comes down to Ralf's willingness to take out the fixing commit and to a
> > stable update (and RM acceptance of it), and pkg-perl's willingness to
> > wait for the next point release.
>
> Oh, we aren't in any particular hurry though I'd obviously like it to
> happen early enough for buster :) There's also #867081 to fix before we
> can reinstate the versioned Provides in perl anyway.
OK, I will go for the next stretch point release. Cheers -Ralf.
Reply to: