Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification
Hi,
Here is a small update about mips64el (and mips).
On 2016-06-16 10:25, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2016-06-16 02:12, Hector Oron wrote:
> > > * mips64el (NEW)
> > > - No DSA buildd (RT blocker)
> >
> > As far as I can see mips64el is using shared builds with mipsel port
> > hardware, those machines are DSA.
>
> We also have the confirmation that the UTM-8 machines sent by
> Imagination Technologies have arrived at MAN-DA and SIL about one month
> ago. They still need to be racked and installed.
The machines at SIL have been racked and installed:
- mips-sil-01.debian.org building mips (it has an FPU)
- mipsel-sil-01.debian.org building mips64el and then mipsel
Also we have changed mipsel-manda-02 so that it builds first mips64el
and then mipsel.
This means we should have enough DSAed buildds for mips64el. When
MAN-DA machines are installed we'll get more redundancy.
> > > - Rebuild after import not complete (RT Blocker)
> >
> > Is there a list of packages that should be rebuilt?
>
> It is available here:
>
> https://ftp-master.debian.org/users/mhy/mipsel64import.txt
>
> There is only a single package: db5.3. It is currently not buildable as
> the ecj package doesn't build. The ecj java bytecode is not executed
> correctly by gij. We have made some progress on this recently with a
> simple reproducer not involving ecj. Matthew Fortune from Imagination
> Technologies is currently working on that currently and has already
> found that it is due to a sign extension issue at the JIT'd/FFI layer.
> I therefore expect a solution a solution soon.
There has been some progress there too, a patch has been sent upstream:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2016-q2/msg00020.html
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
Reply to: