Re: Request to give back srm-ifce and lcgdm

[Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>]

On 23/09/16 12:00, Mattias Ellert wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> There was recently a binmnu rebuild of srm-ifce and lcgdm due to the
> libgsoap10 transition. This rebuild failed on some architectures.
> 
> The reason for the failure is a build order dependency. The cgsi-gsoap
> package, which was also rebuilt for the libgsoap10 transition, is also
> a build requirement for srm-ifce and lcgdm, and in order for the srm-
> ifce and lcgdm builds to succeed, the cgsi-gsoap build must be done
> first.
> 
> This ordering requirement was not taken into account for the binnmus
> triggered by the transition, and depending on whether the cgsi-gsoap
> build happened first or not on a given architecture, some srm-ifce and
> lcgdm failed and some succeeded.
> 
> The cgsi-gsoap binnmus are now mostly completed, so giving back the
> failed binnmus for srm-ifce and lcgdm should succeed.
> 
> Requested givebacks for srm-ifce:
> 
> amd64
> arm64
> mips
> mipsel
> powerpc
> hurd-i386
> kfreebsd-amd64
> kfreebsd-i386
> 
> Requested givebacks for lcgdm:
> 
> amd64
> arm64
> mips
> powerpc
> ppc64el
> s390x
> alpha
> kfreebsd-amd64
> kfreebsd-i386

I just gave them back on all the failed arches.

Emilio