Re: Request to give back srm-ifce and lcgdm
On 28/04/16 09:59, Mattias Ellert wrote:
> Hi!
>
> There was recently a binmnu rebuild of srm-ifce and lcgdm due to the
> libgsoap9 transition. This rebuild failed on some architectures.
>
> The reason for the failure is a build order dependency. The cgsi-gsoap
> package, which was also rebuilt for the libgsoap9 transition, is also a
> build requirement for srm-ifce and lcgdm, and in order for the srm-ifce
> and lcgdm builds to succeed, the cgsi-gsoap build must be done first.
>
> This ordering requirement was not taken into account for the binnmus
> triggered by the transition, and depending on whether the cgsi-gsoap
> build happened first or not on a given architecture, some srm-ifce and
> lcgdm failed and some succeeded.
>
> The cgsi-gsoap binnmus are now mostly completed, so giving back the
> failed binnmus for srm-ifce and lcgdm should succeed.
>
> Requested givebacks of srm-ifce and lcgdm:
>
> amd64
> arm64
> armel
> armhf
> i386
> mips
> mipsel
> powerpc
> ppc64el
> s390x
> hurd-i386
> kfreebsd-amd64
> kfreebsd-i386
> mips64el
Given back.
Emilio
Reply to: