Re: Request to give back srm-ifce and lcgdm

[Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>]

On 08/02/16 09:43, Mattias Ellert wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> There was recently a binmnu rebuild of srm-ifce and lcgdm due to the
> libgsoap8 transition. This rebuild failed on some architectures.
> 
> The reason for the failure is a build order dependency. The cgsi-gsoap
> package, which was also rebuilt for the libgsoap8 transition, is also a
> build requirement for srm-ifce and lcgdm, and in order for the srm-ifce 
> and lcgdm builds to succeed, the cgsi-gsoap build must be done first.
> This ordering requirement was not taken into account for the binnmus
> triggered by the transition, and depending on whether the cgsi-gsoap
> build happened first or not on a given architecture, some srm-ifce and
> lcgdm failed and some succeeded.
> 
> The cgsi-gsoap binnmus are now all completed, so giving back the failed
> binnmus for srm-ifce and lcgdm should succeed.
> 
> Requested givebacks:
> 
> lcgdm:    arm64        powerpc s390x kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 mipsel64el
> srm-ifce: arm64 mipsel powerpc       kfreebsd-amd64               mipsel64el

That's done.

Cheers,
Emilio