+++ Philipp Huebner [2015-10-07 13:13 +0200]: > Hello, > > there was a bug in rebar that caused several erlang-p1-* packages to > FTBFS on certain architectures. Once that was fixed, the packages where > automatically and successfully built again, but for some unknown reason > the resulting binary packages for arm64 never appeared in the archive. Yes something very odd has happenned here. > So please initiate give backs for them: > > gb erlang-p1-pam_0.2015.02.23-1 . arm64 > gb erlang-p1-sip_0.2015.07.22-1 . arm64 > gb erlang-p1-stun_0.2015.09.16-1 . arm64 > gb erlang-p1-tls_0.2015.08.03-1 . arm64 so all 4 of these are indeed currently only in the archive at earlier versions (from debian-ports) https://packages.debian.org/unstable/erlang-p1-pam https://packages.debian.org/unstable/erlang-p1-sip https://packages.debian.org/unstable/erlang-p1-stun https://packages.debian.org/unstable/erlang-p1-tls However -pam and -sip and -tls already have build-logs for the new version: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=erlang-p1-pam https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=erlang-p1-sip https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=erlang-p1-tls and -stun is BD-uninstallable (waiting for -tls) If these versions have already been built will a give-back actually rebuild them and unbung this? I think it should, so scheduled ... (thanks to chistoph for reminding me of the . -o override option) Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Debian, Wookware, ARM http://wookware.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature